Avaliação Qualitativa da Pós-Graduação na Área de Ensino: Qualidade dos Dados e Desafios na Modalidade Profissional

The Graduate Assessment Form restructuring in the teaching area presented changes resulting from the expansion of qualitative indicators in the general assessment process of graduate programs (GPs). Peer review is the modality established by CAPES for assessing programs, with training reflection as a guideline, which contributes to the feedback needed to improve teaching processes and procedures. In the committees, consultants work together to develop and/or detail the criteria to support the organization of work and the design of assessment strategies. Since the 2017–2020 Quadrennial Assessment, concerns have arisen about what GPs, in the professional modality of the teaching area, have prioritized to value the quality of information included in the CAPES Data Collection report. In this context, this article, in essay format, adopts a theoretical-descriptive nature to reflect on the meaning of each part of the Assessment Form, and aims to contribute to assessment inherent to the reality of programs and their training and research practices, valuing their insertion, modality and vocation, in line with the teaching area criteria. Based on the authors’ experience in the assessment process developed in the last four years, the adopted criteria that guide assessment work are discussed, with contributions to improving the programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2024u12731296
Primary Topic
Education and Public Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Avaliação Qualitativa da Pós-Graduação na Área de Ensino: Qualidade dos Dados e Desafios na Modalidade Profissional

Rosana Aparecida Salvador Rossit, Ivanise Maria Rizzatti, Giselle Rôças, Cleidilene Ramos Magalhães
Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências
Education and Public Policy
article

Avaliação Qualitativa da Pós-Graduação na Área de Ensino: Qualidade dos Dados e Desafios na Modalidade Profissional

Rosana Aparecida Salvador Rossit, Ivanise Maria Rizzatti, Giselle Rôças, Cleidilene Ramos Magalhães
article en

Abstract

The Graduate Assessment Form restructuring in the teaching area presented changes resulting from the expansion of qualitative indicators in the general assessment process of graduate programs (GPs). Peer review is the modality established by CAPES for assessing programs, with training reflection as a guideline, which contributes to the feedback needed to improve teaching processes and procedures. In the committees, consultants work together to develop and/or detail the criteria to support the organization of work and the design of assessment strategies. Since the 2017–2020 Quadrennial Assessment, concerns have arisen about what GPs, in the professional modality of the teaching area, have prioritized to value the quality of information included in the CAPES Data Collection report. In this context, this article, in essay format, adopts a theoretical-descriptive nature to reflect on the meaning of each part of the Assessment Form, and aims to contribute to assessment inherent to the reality of programs and their training and research practices, valuing their insertion, modality and vocation, in line with the teaching area criteria. Based on the authors’ experience in the assessment process developed in the last four years, the adopted criteria that guide assessment work are discussed, with contributions to improving the programs.

Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (BR), Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Instituto de Saúde (BR), Universidade Federal de Roraima (BR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Education and Public Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.