Variance reduction and measurement errors in estimating lactation milk yields using best prediction: An analytical review

Best prediction (BP) has been used in the United States to estimate unobserved daily and lactation yields from known test-day yields since 1999. This method has proven more accurate than its predecessors. However, it has 2 remarkable challenges in practice. First, BP reduces the variance of estimated yields compared with actual yields. Reduced phenotypic variance represents a concern because it can significantly underestimate genetic variations in genetic evaluations. Second, measurement errors occur in the projected lactation yields from incomplete or inaccurate test-day records. These errors can adversely affect the accuracy of lactation yield estimations and the subsequent genetic evaluations. This article provides an analytical review of BP, focusing on variance reduction and measurement errors. We demonstrate how variance reduction and measurement errors can be intrinsic to the method. Illustrative examples are presented, highlighting the practical challenges and possible solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JDS Communications
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2024-0622
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variance reduction and measurement errors in estimating lactation milk yields using best prediction: An analytical review

John B. Cole, P.M. VanRaden, H.D. Norman, Xiao‐Lin Wu
JDS Communications
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
article

Variance reduction and measurement errors in estimating lactation milk yields using best prediction: An analytical review

John B. Cole, P.M. VanRaden, H.D. Norman, Xiao‐Lin Wu
article en

Abstract

Best prediction (BP) has been used in the United States to estimate unobserved daily and lactation yields from known test-day yields since 1999. This method has proven more accurate than its predecessors. However, it has 2 remarkable challenges in practice. First, BP reduces the variance of estimated yields compared with actual yields. Reduced phenotypic variance represents a concern because it can significantly underestimate genetic variations in genetic evaluations. Second, measurement errors occur in the projected lactation yields from incomplete or inaccurate test-day records. These errors can adversely affect the accuracy of lactation yield estimations and the subsequent genetic evaluations. This article provides an analytical review of BP, focusing on variance reduction and measurement errors. We demonstrate how variance reduction and measurement errors can be intrinsic to the method. Illustrative examples are presented, highlighting the practical challenges and possible solutions.

JDS CommunicationsVol. 6(2)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), North Carolina State University (US), University of Florida (US), Dairy Management (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Variance reduction and measurement errors in estimating lactation milk yields using best prediction: An analytical review — John B. Cole, P.M. VanRaden, et al. · JDS Communications (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS