A systematic risk spillover perspective for modelling China's energy security: Firm-level evidence

The concept of energy security has gained extensive attention in academic interest. We use firm-level data to evaluate China's energy security from 2013 to 2022. The newly devised energy security index reveals temporal variability, particularly during extreme events. Employing a risk diffusion network matrix, we uncover that risks encountered by energy firms can substantially compromise energy security through two key channels: corporate productivity and energy investment efficiency. Further causality tests reveal that disruptions like COVID-19 have intensified the link between China's energy security and geopolitical risks, suggesting a bidirectional causality. However, the results indicate a unidirectional predictive relationship flowing from global geopolitical risks to China's energy security. This study deepens theoretical insights into energy security and offers vital environmental management implications, underscoring the role of strategic risk management in sustaining energy resilience and efficiency amidst geopolitical and global challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123650
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic risk spillover perspective for modelling China's energy security: Firm-level evidence

David Roubaud, Miaomiao Tao, Oksana Grebinevych
7 citations
Journal of Environmental Management
Global Energy Security and Policy
4.11
article

A systematic risk spillover perspective for modelling China's energy security: Firm-level evidence

David Roubaud, Miaomiao Tao, Oksana Grebinevych
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The concept of energy security has gained extensive attention in academic interest. We use firm-level data to evaluate China's energy security from 2013 to 2022. The newly devised energy security index reveals temporal variability, particularly during extreme events. Employing a risk diffusion network matrix, we uncover that risks encountered by energy firms can substantially compromise energy security through two key channels: corporate productivity and energy investment efficiency. Further causality tests reveal that disruptions like COVID-19 have intensified the link between China's energy security and geopolitical risks, suggesting a bidirectional causality. However, the results indicate a unidirectional predictive relationship flowing from global geopolitical risks to China's energy security. This study deepens theoretical insights into energy security and offers vital environmental management implications, underscoring the role of strategic risk management in sustaining energy resilience and efficiency amidst geopolitical and global challenges.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 373
University of Auckland (NZ), Gulf University for Science & Technology (KW), Auckland University of Technology (NZ), Business France (FR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Global Energy Security and Policy
4.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.