Society for the Study of Addiction Annual Conference 2024

Research funded by sources with a vested interest in the outcomes of that research introduces a risk of funding-related bias.This risk has been an issue of concern in multiple domains, including alcohol, tobacco and medical research.One area in which the issue has been a topic of much debate is the study of gambling-related harms; however, there is currently no evidence-based method of identifying research that may have a high or low risk of funding-related bias.This project aims to develop a reliable, valid instrument to estimate the risk of funding-related bias in gambling studies.To do so, the following activities are being undertaken: (1) conducting a rapid search of the literature to review past work in related fields; (2) conducting a modified e-Delphi study with international researchers and funders to identify factors that contribute to risk of funding-related bias and their weights; and (3) developing and validating an instrument to assess risk of funding-related bias.Further details on the study can be found in the protocol on Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/vncp5/.This tool will be able to support several outcomes, including outlining information for inclusion in funding calls and disclosure statements and improving understanding of the impact of funding source on research area and design and the subsequent potential for influence on policy and legislation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Addiction
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16709
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Society for the Study of Addiction Annual Conference 2024

1 citations
Addiction
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
article

Society for the Study of Addiction Annual Conference 2024

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Research funded by sources with a vested interest in the outcomes of that research introduces a risk of funding-related bias.This risk has been an issue of concern in multiple domains, including alcohol, tobacco and medical research.One area in which the issue has been a topic of much debate is the study of gambling-related harms; however, there is currently no evidence-based method of identifying research that may have a high or low risk of funding-related bias.This project aims to develop a reliable, valid instrument to estimate the risk of funding-related bias in gambling studies.To do so, the following activities are being undertaken: (1) conducting a rapid search of the literature to review past work in related fields; (2) conducting a modified e-Delphi study with international researchers and funders to identify factors that contribute to risk of funding-related bias and their weights; and (3) developing and validating an instrument to assess risk of funding-related bias.Further details on the study can be found in the protocol on Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/vncp5/.This tool will be able to support several outcomes, including outlining information for inclusion in funding calls and disclosure statements and improving understanding of the impact of funding source on research area and design and the subsequent potential for influence on policy and legislation.

AddictionVol. 119(S1)
University of Leeds (GB), Kirklees College (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod (FR), Professional Solutions (United States) (US), Kirklees Council (GB), Hologic (Germany) (DE)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Health and Care Research Wales, Government of Canada, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Leverhulme Trust, GambleAware
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.