Do the Fama–French Factors Proxy Geopolitical Risks?

This article investigates whether geopolitical risk measures have some statistical significance for 20 advanced country equity portfolios in the presence of the Fama–French factors. Baseline regression results indicated that some Fama–French factors appear to be significant for some country and regional equity portfolios. The coefficient of the general geopolitical risk index emerged with a negative sign but not always as statistically significant. The authors used geopolitical threats and acts and found that they marginally added statistical significance beyond what the main risk index provided. Finally, the authors included some macro variables in these regressions and found that the term and credit spreads and the stock market’s dividend yield surfaced as significant. The authors conducted further analyses using panel specification and the Fama–MacBeth methodology. In general, the main findings imply that geopolitical risks may not always be statistically relevant to country equity portfolios in the presence of, at least, the market factor.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Portfolio Management
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2024.1.656
Primary Topic
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do the Fama–French Factors Proxy Geopolitical Risks?

Nikiforos T. Laopodis
The Journal of Portfolio Management
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
article

Do the Fama–French Factors Proxy Geopolitical Risks?

Nikiforos T. Laopodis
article en

Abstract

This article investigates whether geopolitical risk measures have some statistical significance for 20 advanced country equity portfolios in the presence of the Fama–French factors. Baseline regression results indicated that some Fama–French factors appear to be significant for some country and regional equity portfolios. The coefficient of the general geopolitical risk index emerged with a negative sign but not always as statistically significant. The authors used geopolitical threats and acts and found that they marginally added statistical significance beyond what the main risk index provided. Finally, the authors included some macro variables in these regressions and found that the term and credit spreads and the stock market’s dividend yield surfaced as significant. The authors conducted further analyses using panel specification and the Fama–MacBeth methodology. In general, the main findings imply that geopolitical risks may not always be statistically relevant to country equity portfolios in the presence of, at least, the market factor.

The Journal of Portfolio ManagementVol. 51(3)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.