COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF SUPRAPATELLAR AND INFRAPATELLAR APPROACH FOR INTRAMEDULLARY INTERLOCKING NAILING OF TIBIA

This randomized controlled study aimed to compare surgical duration, intra-operative blood loss, and fluoroscopy time between the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches for intramedullary interlocking nailing of tibia. We included 40 adult patients with tibial shaft fractures, excluding those with non-union, revision surgery, or polytrauma. Patients were divided equally into two groups using block randomization: Group A (20 patients) underwent the infrapatellar approach, and Group B (20 patients) underwent the suprapatellar approach. Blood loss was measured using gravimetric method and by changes in pre-operative and post operative haemoglobin levels. Surgical duration was estimated by calculating the time elapsed between the start and end of the procedure and fluoroscopy time was logged from the fluoroscopy machine. In group A, blood loss averaged 154±30.98ml, slightly more than in group B (150±32.92ml), though the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Group A also showed a higher difference in haemoglobin levels (2.20±1.13 gm/dl) compared to group B (1.15±0.93 gm/dl), which was statistically significant (p=0.02). Fluoroscopy time and surgery duration were slightly longer in group A compared to group B but not statistically significant(p=0.693). The suprapatellar approach results in lesser blood loss, potentially promoting faster recovery, reduced need for blood transfusions and shorter hospital stays. It also entails shorter fluoroscopy time and surgical duration (though not statistically significant) which may reduce radiation exposure for the surgical team.