PREGNANCY AND IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS: A TEN-YEAR COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF INTRA-PARTUM OUTCOMES

Objectives To determine whether patients with scoliosis, treated with or without surgery, are at higher risk of needing caesarean section. To determine whether patients with scoliosis, treated with or without surgery, have increased intra-partum obstetric analgesic requirements. Design and Methods Retrospective cohort study wherein obstetric outcomes were analysed in women with scoliosis in a tertiary teaching hospital. Women with scoliosis were identified using the high-risk obstetric anaesthesia register. Data was collected between May 2013 to April 2023. Results We identified 39 women with corrected scoliosis. 38 patients in the scoliosis correction group and 112 patients in the uncorrected scoliosis group were analysed. Within the corrected group, 11 patients underwent lower segment caesarean section, for obstetric reasons. There were 5 GA's administered in the group, all in patients that had rods finishing at or below L3 level. All other patients underwent successful regional anaesthesia. BMI ranged between 17 and 30, with only two patients with a BMI more than 30. In the uncorrected group, 34 underwent LSCS, all for obstetric indications. There were 2 GA administrations for failure of epidural top up. Six patients underwent two LSCS in this period and one patient underwent three. The rest of LSCSs were under regional anaesthesia. BMI range in this group was between 18 to 30 with only two patients having a BMI between 31 to 36. In the corrected group, 16 patients had no analgesia during labour and in the uncorrected group 39 had no analgesia for labour. Epidural requirement in the corrected group was 23% and in the uncorrected group was 33% Conclusion In our cohort, the rate of LSCS was 28% and 30% in the corrected and uncorrected scoliosis groups respectively. Our unit's average rate of LSCS in the non-scoliosis women has increased over the decade, from 28% to 45% in line with the national data. In conclusion, the need for LSCS were comparable or even lesser in the scoliosis groups and administration of regional anaesthesia or a general anaesthesia was determined by the level of lowest instrumented vertebra

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2024.20.008
Primary Topic
Pregnancy-related medical research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PREGNANCY AND IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS: A TEN-YEAR COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF INTRA-PARTUM OUTCOMES

Khalid B. Mirza, Joginder Chopra, Ganesh Swamy, Jose Austine et al.
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Pregnancy-related medical research
article

PREGNANCY AND IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS: A TEN-YEAR COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF INTRA-PARTUM OUTCOMES

Khalid B. Mirza, Joginder Chopra, Ganesh Swamy, Jose Austine, R Monzur, C El-Labany, L Ingham
article en

Abstract

Objectives To determine whether patients with scoliosis, treated with or without surgery, are at higher risk of needing caesarean section. To determine whether patients with scoliosis, treated with or without surgery, have increased intra-partum obstetric analgesic requirements. Design and Methods Retrospective cohort study wherein obstetric outcomes were analysed in women with scoliosis in a tertiary teaching hospital. Women with scoliosis were identified using the high-risk obstetric anaesthesia register. Data was collected between May 2013 to April 2023. Results We identified 39 women with corrected scoliosis. 38 patients in the scoliosis correction group and 112 patients in the uncorrected scoliosis group were analysed. Within the corrected group, 11 patients underwent lower segment caesarean section, for obstetric reasons. There were 5 GA's administered in the group, all in patients that had rods finishing at or below L3 level. All other patients underwent successful regional anaesthesia. BMI ranged between 17 and 30, with only two patients with a BMI more than 30. In the uncorrected group, 34 underwent LSCS, all for obstetric indications. There were 2 GA administrations for failure of epidural top up. Six patients underwent two LSCS in this period and one patient underwent three. The rest of LSCSs were under regional anaesthesia. BMI range in this group was between 18 to 30 with only two patients having a BMI between 31 to 36. In the corrected group, 16 patients had no analgesia during labour and in the uncorrected group 39 had no analgesia for labour. Epidural requirement in the corrected group was 23% and in the uncorrected group was 33% Conclusion In our cohort, the rate of LSCS was 28% and 30% in the corrected and uncorrected scoliosis groups respectively. Our unit's average rate of LSCS in the non-scoliosis women has increased over the decade, from 28% to 45% in line with the national data. In conclusion, the need for LSCS were comparable or even lesser in the scoliosis groups and administration of regional anaesthesia or a general anaesthesia was determined by the level of lowest instrumented vertebra

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 106-B(SUPP_20)
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Pregnancy-related medical research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.