“Export” of ninth- to tenth-century Chinese bronze mirrors: Shipwreck findings from the Java Sea

Abstract This study examines the “export” of Chinese bronze mirrors and their destinations from the ninth to the tenth century, focusing on three shipwrecks—Belitung, Intan, and Cirebon—discovered in the Java Sea, Indonesia. Approximately 70 Chinese bronze mirrors were recovered from these wrecks. Through a comprehensive analysis of the styles, assemblages, and spatial distribution of the mirrors found on these shipwrecks, and by comparing them with contemporaneous examples unearthed from tombs, pagodas, and hoards, this study argues that the distinction between “export” bronze mirrors and those “domestic” lies in the coexistence of new and old mirrors in the export cases. These export assemblages featured a higher proportion of heavier and more exquisitely crafted “old mirrors.” This distinction is attributed to the specific demands of overseas markets such as Southeast Asia, West Asia, and Central Asia for high-quality Chinese bronze products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Archaeology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/char-2024-0013
Primary Topic
Asian Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Export” of ninth- to tenth-century Chinese bronze mirrors: Shipwreck findings from the Java Sea

Canping Chen
Chinese Archaeology
Asian Studies and History
article

“Export” of ninth- to tenth-century Chinese bronze mirrors: Shipwreck findings from the Java Sea

Canping Chen
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the “export” of Chinese bronze mirrors and their destinations from the ninth to the tenth century, focusing on three shipwrecks—Belitung, Intan, and Cirebon—discovered in the Java Sea, Indonesia. Approximately 70 Chinese bronze mirrors were recovered from these wrecks. Through a comprehensive analysis of the styles, assemblages, and spatial distribution of the mirrors found on these shipwrecks, and by comparing them with contemporaneous examples unearthed from tombs, pagodas, and hoards, this study argues that the distinction between “export” bronze mirrors and those “domestic” lies in the coexistence of new and old mirrors in the export cases. These export assemblages featured a higher proportion of heavier and more exquisitely crafted “old mirrors.” This distinction is attributed to the specific demands of overseas markets such as Southeast Asia, West Asia, and Central Asia for high-quality Chinese bronze products.

Chinese ArchaeologyVol. 24(1)
Hebei Normal University (CN)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Asian Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.