Bursty Versus Continuous Transmission for Wireless Streaming

This paper analyzes energy consumption in wireless streaming with delay constraints. One fundamental question is whether the transmitter should transmit a steady stream of bits, continuous transmission, or transmit data in bursts and switch off while not transmitting. In the latter case, a question is also for what fraction of time the transmitter should transmit, the duty cycle. In this paper we use traditional and finite blocklength information theory to see whether bursty transmission would be better than transmitting data continuously. When doing this analysis we consider latency and energy efficiency, two fundamental parameters that characterize communication systems. We take into account realistic models of hardware, including overhead power, power amplifier inefficiency and the receiver noise factor. With these models we find that the energy consumption and latency tradeoff behaves quite differently from the ideal case.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Communications
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tcomm.2024.3516523
Primary Topic
Advanced Wireless Network Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bursty Versus Continuous Transmission for Wireless Streaming

Jeffrey A. Weldon, Zixiang Xiong, Nicholas Whitcomb, Anders Høst-Madsen
IEEE Transactions on Communications
Advanced Wireless Network Optimization
article

Bursty Versus Continuous Transmission for Wireless Streaming

Jeffrey A. Weldon, Zixiang Xiong, Nicholas Whitcomb, Anders Høst-Madsen
article en

Abstract

This paper analyzes energy consumption in wireless streaming with delay constraints. One fundamental question is whether the transmitter should transmit a steady stream of bits, continuous transmission, or transmit data in bursts and switch off while not transmitting. In the latter case, a question is also for what fraction of time the transmitter should transmit, the duty cycle. In this paper we use traditional and finite blocklength information theory to see whether bursty transmission would be better than transmitting data continuously. When doing this analysis we consider latency and energy efficiency, two fundamental parameters that characterize communication systems. We take into account realistic models of hardware, including overhead power, power amplifier inefficiency and the receiver noise factor. With these models we find that the energy consumption and latency tradeoff behaves quite differently from the ideal case.

IEEE Transactions on CommunicationsVol. 73(7)
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), Texas A&M University (US)
National Science Foundation
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Advanced Wireless Network Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.