Carbon Dioxide Emissions Monitoring and Analysis of Coal-Fired Units under Different Techniques

Accurate carbon emission monitoring is essential for enterprises to understand their emissions and effectively implement reduction measures. Using 300MW, 600MW, and 1000MW coal-fired power generation units as examples, this paper studies the differences between various carbon dioxide monitoring methods, including the carbon emission accounting method and the carbon emission online monitoring method. The results show that in carbon emission accounting, the mass balance method yields 14.4% to 15.84% lower results than the emission factor method. The online monitoring method results are higher than the accounting method, with a relative difference between 11.8% and 17.1%. The accounting methods are relatively mature and cost-effective, but they mainly rely on manual calculations, which can easily lead to data falsification issues. The online monitoring method is less affected by manual interference and offers high timeliness and automation. However, it comes with higher costs and equipment requirements. Therefore, it is essential to develop both types of carbon emission monitoring methods collaboratively, allowing for mutual verification and data validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/dtpi61353.2024.10778880
Primary Topic
Coal Properties and Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon Dioxide Emissions Monitoring and Analysis of Coal-Fired Units under Different Techniques

Haidong Fan, Shuyin Wu, Tongxing Zhang, Xiang Wang et al.
Coal Properties and Utilization
article

Carbon Dioxide Emissions Monitoring and Analysis of Coal-Fired Units under Different Techniques

Haidong Fan, Shuyin Wu, Tongxing Zhang, Xiang Wang, Yin Feng, Zhenhua Ni, Chang Tian
article en

Abstract

Accurate carbon emission monitoring is essential for enterprises to understand their emissions and effectively implement reduction measures. Using 300MW, 600MW, and 1000MW coal-fired power generation units as examples, this paper studies the differences between various carbon dioxide monitoring methods, including the carbon emission accounting method and the carbon emission online monitoring method. The results show that in carbon emission accounting, the mass balance method yields 14.4% to 15.84% lower results than the emission factor method. The online monitoring method results are higher than the accounting method, with a relative difference between 11.8% and 17.1%. The accounting methods are relatively mature and cost-effective, but they mainly rely on manual calculations, which can easily lead to data falsification issues. The online monitoring method is less affected by manual interference and offers high timeliness and automation. However, it comes with higher costs and equipment requirements. Therefore, it is essential to develop both types of carbon emission monitoring methods collaboratively, allowing for mutual verification and data validation.

Zhejiang Lab (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Coal Properties and Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.