Refined Question Reading for Multi-Type Legal Question Answering

Multi-type Legal Question Answering(MLQA) aims to automatically answer legal questions described in natural language. Existing MLQA models typically consist of a text reading component and an answer prediction component. However, their text reading often focuses on how to handle long legal documents, and pays few attention to the given question, potentially leading to suboptimal answering performance. Our observation indicates that although current MLQA models may perform well for single-span extraction in terms of F1, their effectiveness in multi-span extraction becomes particularly worse in terms of Exact Match(EM) where multiple answer spans are required with fixed span number and ordering. To address this issue, we propose a new, pluggable, question-refining reading module. This module is compatible with diverse answer prediction components and assists different MLQA models in better focusing on the question content. Consequently, it enhances the prediction accuracy of MLQA. Experimental results on the CAIL 2021 Law MRC dataset, the largest one in MLQA demonstrate that our module significantly outperforms the existing state-of-the-art models, by 1.2% to 10.4% in terms of EM with competitive F1 values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/besc64747.2024.10780776
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refined Question Reading for Multi-Type Legal Question Answering

Yu Yin, Xiaohui Tao, Lin Li, Jianwei Zhang et al.
Topic Modeling
article

Refined Question Reading for Multi-Type Legal Question Answering

Yu Yin, Xiaohui Tao, Lin Li, Jianwei Zhang, Shugui Xie
article en

Abstract

Multi-type Legal Question Answering(MLQA) aims to automatically answer legal questions described in natural language. Existing MLQA models typically consist of a text reading component and an answer prediction component. However, their text reading often focuses on how to handle long legal documents, and pays few attention to the given question, potentially leading to suboptimal answering performance. Our observation indicates that although current MLQA models may perform well for single-span extraction in terms of F1, their effectiveness in multi-span extraction becomes particularly worse in terms of Exact Match(EM) where multiple answer spans are required with fixed span number and ordering. To address this issue, we propose a new, pluggable, question-refining reading module. This module is compatible with diverse answer prediction components and assists different MLQA models in better focusing on the question content. Consequently, it enhances the prediction accuracy of MLQA. Experimental results on the CAIL 2021 Law MRC dataset, the largest one in MLQA demonstrate that our module significantly outperforms the existing state-of-the-art models, by 1.2% to 10.4% in terms of EM with competitive F1 values.

Iwate University (JP), University of Southern Queensland (AU), Wuhan University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.