Are Explanations Helpful? A Comparative Analysis of Explainability Methods in Skin Lesion Classifiers

Deep Learning has shown outstanding results in computer vision tasks; healthcare is no exception. However, there is no straightforward way to expose the decision-making process of DL models. Good accuracy is not enough for skin cancer predictions. Understanding the model's behavior is crucial for clinical application and reliable outcomes. In this work, we identify desiderata for explanations in skin-lesion models. We analyzed seven methods, four based on pixel-attribution (Grad-CAM, Score-CAM, LIME, SHAP) and three high-level concepts (ACE, ICE, CME), for a deep neural network trained on the International Skin Imaging Collaboration Archive. Our findings indicate that while these techniques reveal biases, there is room for improving the comprehensiveness of explanations to achieve transparency in skin-lesion models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/sipaim62974.2024.10783606
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Explanations Helpful? A Comparative Analysis of Explainability Methods in Skin Lesion Classifiers

Rosa Y. G. Paccotacya-Yanque, Sandra Avila, Alceu Bissoto
8 citations
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.78
article

Are Explanations Helpful? A Comparative Analysis of Explainability Methods in Skin Lesion Classifiers

Rosa Y. G. Paccotacya-Yanque, Sandra Avila, Alceu Bissoto
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Deep Learning has shown outstanding results in computer vision tasks; healthcare is no exception. However, there is no straightforward way to expose the decision-making process of DL models. Good accuracy is not enough for skin cancer predictions. Understanding the model's behavior is crucial for clinical application and reliable outcomes. In this work, we identify desiderata for explanations in skin-lesion models. We analyzed seven methods, four based on pixel-attribution (Grad-CAM, Score-CAM, LIME, SHAP) and three high-level concepts (ACE, ICE, CME), for a deep neural network trained on the International Skin Imaging Collaboration Archive. Our findings indicate that while these techniques reveal biases, there is room for improving the comprehensiveness of explanations to achieve transparency in skin-lesion models.

Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Universitätsklinik für Diabetologie, Endokrinologie, Ernährungsmedizin & Metabolismus (CH)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.