CEM Radiomics for Distinguishing Benign vs Malignant Lesions in Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer or Benign Breast Lesions

In this retrospective study, 126 women with 143 biopsy proven invasive breast cancers (IBC) or benign lesions were imaged using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), prior to any treatment. Size-matched segmentations were manually contoured by an experienced breast radiologist on the CEM capturing the breast lesion (denoted as ROI), breast parenchymal enhancement (BPE), and the fat, respectively. Radiomics analysis was performed using LIFEx software and 111 radiomics metrics spanning 6 different texture families were extracted from each segmentation. Predictive models of benign vs malignant lesions were developed using CEM radiomics models Random Forest, Real Adaboost, and ElasticNet classifiers with data from the ROI only, BPE only, and ROI + BPE. Radiomics values extracted from fat region were then subtracted from the radiomics metrics extracted from the ROI and BPE, respectively, to enhance data harmonization. The 10- fold cross validation was used to assess model performance. RF classifier achieved an AUC of 0.92 for the ROI + BPE. The Adaboost classifier achieved an AUC of 0.97 for the ROI only, and 0.90 for the BPE only. The high performance across all three assessments showed that CEM radiomics can distinguish between benign and malignant breast lesions using information from the background parenchyma with and without the lesion itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/sipaim62974.2024.10783603
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CEM Radiomics for Distinguishing Benign vs Malignant Lesions in Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer or Benign Breast Lesions

Steven Cen, Bino Varghese, Melinda Y. Chang, Jacquelyn Fields et al.
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

CEM Radiomics for Distinguishing Benign vs Malignant Lesions in Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer or Benign Breast Lesions

Steven Cen, Bino Varghese, Melinda Y. Chang, Jacquelyn Fields, Linda Hovanessian‐Larsen, Ketki Kinkar, Darryl Hwang, Mary Yamashita, Xiaomeng Lei, Sandy Lee, Shubham Gujar, Mariam Thomas
article en

Abstract

In this retrospective study, 126 women with 143 biopsy proven invasive breast cancers (IBC) or benign lesions were imaged using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), prior to any treatment. Size-matched segmentations were manually contoured by an experienced breast radiologist on the CEM capturing the breast lesion (denoted as ROI), breast parenchymal enhancement (BPE), and the fat, respectively. Radiomics analysis was performed using LIFEx software and 111 radiomics metrics spanning 6 different texture families were extracted from each segmentation. Predictive models of benign vs malignant lesions were developed using CEM radiomics models Random Forest, Real Adaboost, and ElasticNet classifiers with data from the ROI only, BPE only, and ROI + BPE. Radiomics values extracted from fat region were then subtracted from the radiomics metrics extracted from the ROI and BPE, respectively, to enhance data harmonization. The 10- fold cross validation was used to assess model performance. RF classifier achieved an AUC of 0.92 for the ROI + BPE. The Adaboost classifier achieved an AUC of 0.97 for the ROI only, and 0.90 for the BPE only. The high performance across all three assessments showed that CEM radiomics can distinguish between benign and malignant breast lesions using information from the background parenchyma with and without the lesion itself.

University of Southern California (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Olive View-UCLA Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.