Hard Adversarial Example Mining for Improving Robust Fairness

Adversarial training (AT) is widely considered the state-of-the-art technique for improving the robustness of deep neural networks (DNNs) against adversarial examples (AEs). Nevertheless, recent studies have revealed that adversarially trained models are prone to unfairness problems. Recent works in this field usually apply class-wise regularization methods to enhance the fairness of AT. However, this paper discovers that these paradigms can be sub-optimal in improving robust fairness. Specifically, we empirically observe that the AEs that are already robust (referred to as “easy AEs” in this paper) are useless and even harmful in improving robust fairness. To this end, we propose the hard adversarial example mining (HAM) technique which concentrates on mining hard AEs while discarding the easy AEs in AT. Specifically, HAM identifies the easy AEs and hard AEs with a fast adversarial attack method. By discarding the easy AEs and reweighting the hard AEs, the robust fairness of the model can be efficiently and effectively improved. Extensive experimental results on four image classification datasets demonstrate the improvement of HAM in robust fairness and training efficiency compared to several state-of-the-art fair adversarial training methods. Our code is available at <uri xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://github.com/yyl-github-1896/HAM</uri>.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tifs.2024.3516554
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hard Adversarial Example Mining for Improving Robust Fairness

Liming Fang, Zhe Peng, Chenhao Lin, Yulong Yang et al.
7 citations
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
2.43
article

Hard Adversarial Example Mining for Improving Robust Fairness

Liming Fang, Zhe Peng, Chenhao Lin, Yulong Yang, Zhengyu Zhao, Run Wang, Xiang Ji, Chao Shen, Qian Li
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Adversarial training (AT) is widely considered the state-of-the-art technique for improving the robustness of deep neural networks (DNNs) against adversarial examples (AEs). Nevertheless, recent studies have revealed that adversarially trained models are prone to unfairness problems. Recent works in this field usually apply class-wise regularization methods to enhance the fairness of AT. However, this paper discovers that these paradigms can be sub-optimal in improving robust fairness. Specifically, we empirically observe that the AEs that are already robust (referred to as “easy AEs” in this paper) are useless and even harmful in improving robust fairness. To this end, we propose the hard adversarial example mining (HAM) technique which concentrates on mining hard AEs while discarding the easy AEs in AT. Specifically, HAM identifies the easy AEs and hard AEs with a fast adversarial attack method. By discarding the easy AEs and reweighting the hard AEs, the robust fairness of the model can be efficiently and effectively improved. Extensive experimental results on four image classification datasets demonstrate the improvement of HAM in robust fairness and training efficiency compared to several state-of-the-art fair adversarial training methods. Our code is available at <uri xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://github.com/yyl-github-1896/HAM</uri>.

IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and SecurityVol. 20
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Wuhan University (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN), Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
2.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.