Online Arabic and English Digits-in-Noise Tests: Effects of Test Language and At-Home Testing

Arabic DIN thresholds were a little higher than English thresholds for the same listeners. Employing home-based rather than lab-based testing may slightly elevate DIN thresholds, but the effect was marginal. Nonetheless, both factors should be considered when interpreting DIN data. Test-retest differences were low for both languages and environments. To support hearing screening, subsequent research in audiometrically diverse listeners is required, testing the reliability of DIN thresholds and relations to hearing loss.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_jslhr-24-00085
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Online Arabic and English Digits-in-Noise Tests: Effects of Test Language and At-Home Testing

Michael A. Stone, Christopher J. Plack, Adnan M. Shehabi, Kevin J. Munro et al.
5 citations
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.71
article

Online Arabic and English Digits-in-Noise Tests: Effects of Test Language and At-Home Testing

Michael A. Stone, Christopher J. Plack, Adnan M. Shehabi, Kevin J. Munro, Arwa AlJasser, Garreth Prendergast, Hannah Guest, Joseph Laycock
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Arabic DIN thresholds were a little higher than English thresholds for the same listeners. Employing home-based rather than lab-based testing may slightly elevate DIN thresholds, but the effect was marginal. Nonetheless, both factors should be considered when interpreting DIN data. Test-retest differences were low for both languages and environments. To support hearing screening, subsequent research in audiometrically diverse listeners is required, testing the reliability of DIN thresholds and relations to hearing loss.

Journal of Speech Language and Hearing ResearchVol. 68(1)
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), King Saud University (SA), University of Manchester (GB), Ansys (United Kingdom) (GB), Lancaster University (GB), Birzeit University (PS)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, University of Manchester, Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Medical Research Council
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.