O furor de Fúlvia

Comparing Cassius Dio’s Roman History with other sources from Antiquity, we can identify a particularity inherent to his narrative regarding the actions of Fulvia during the 40-30s B.C. Roman civil wars. Dio, we will argue, is categorical in portraying Fulvia as a cruel and unscrupulous woman. Therefore, in this paper, we aim to raise two possibilities of interpretation regarding this characteristic. Firstly, we seek to argue that the peculiarity of Dio’s work is related, in part, to Augustus’ Memories, the main source he used while writing his work, and to the particular construction of Fulvia’s memory made by Octavian and Mark Antony during the end of the Republic. Next, we claim that this specificity is furthermore closely connected to the context in which Dio produced his book and the criticisms the author had to the civil wars and their leaders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Classica - Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24277/classica.v37.2024.1103
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

O furor de Fúlvia

Amanda Prima Borges, Amanda Lemos Fontes
Classica - Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

O furor de Fúlvia

Amanda Prima Borges, Amanda Lemos Fontes
article en

Abstract

Comparing Cassius Dio’s Roman History with other sources from Antiquity, we can identify a particularity inherent to his narrative regarding the actions of Fulvia during the 40-30s B.C. Roman civil wars. Dio, we will argue, is categorical in portraying Fulvia as a cruel and unscrupulous woman. Therefore, in this paper, we aim to raise two possibilities of interpretation regarding this characteristic. Firstly, we seek to argue that the peculiarity of Dio’s work is related, in part, to Augustus’ Memories, the main source he used while writing his work, and to the particular construction of Fulvia’s memory made by Octavian and Mark Antony during the end of the Republic. Next, we claim that this specificity is furthermore closely connected to the context in which Dio produced his book and the criticisms the author had to the civil wars and their leaders.

Classica - Revista Brasileira de Estudos ClássicosVol. 37
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.