Optimizing public-private partnerships to support clinical cancer research

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) in cancer research have emerged as a pivotal model in the development of strategies to rapidly advance therapeutic innovations. The collaboration between public entities, such as government agencies and research institutions, and private entities, including pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, as well as nonprofit organizations, brings together diverse expertise, resources, and perspectives to address the challenges of efficient drug development and equitable care delivery. This synergy has the potential to accelerate the translation of basic research findings into tangible clinical applications. However, the implementation of PPPs is challenging and fraught with pitfalls that must be overcome if the PPP is to be successful in achieving its goals. To address these issues, in October 2023, the National Cancer Policy Forum and the Forum on Drug Discovery, Development, and Translation held the "Optimizing Public-Private Partnerships for Clinical Cancer Research" workshop in Washington, DC. The goal of the workshop was to examine opportunities to promote collaboration among these various entities through PPPs to facilitate more timely and effective clinical cancer research. Key guiding principles and strategies were highlighted, and the challenges and barriers to implementing a PPP and recommendations to overcome those obstacles are summarized herein.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae279
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing public-private partnerships to support clinical cancer research

Lawrence N. Shulman, Roy S. Herbst, Robert A. Winn, Samir N. Khleif et al.
3 citations
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
0.98
article

Optimizing public-private partnerships to support clinical cancer research

Lawrence N. Shulman, Roy S. Herbst, Robert A. Winn, Samir N. Khleif, Gideon M. Blumenthal, Richard L. Schilsky, Neal J. Meropol, H A Smith, Scott M. Lippman, Meina Wang, Kristen Rosati
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) in cancer research have emerged as a pivotal model in the development of strategies to rapidly advance therapeutic innovations. The collaboration between public entities, such as government agencies and research institutions, and private entities, including pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, as well as nonprofit organizations, brings together diverse expertise, resources, and perspectives to address the challenges of efficient drug development and equitable care delivery. This synergy has the potential to accelerate the translation of basic research findings into tangible clinical applications. However, the implementation of PPPs is challenging and fraught with pitfalls that must be overcome if the PPP is to be successful in achieving its goals. To address these issues, in October 2023, the National Cancer Policy Forum and the Forum on Drug Discovery, Development, and Translation held the "Optimizing Public-Private Partnerships for Clinical Cancer Research" workshop in Washington, DC. The goal of the workshop was to examine opportunities to promote collaboration among these various entities through PPPs to facilitate more timely and effective clinical cancer research. Key guiding principles and strategies were highlighted, and the challenges and barriers to implementing a PPP and recommendations to overcome those obstacles are summarized herein.

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer InstituteVol. 117(7)
Novartis (Switzerland) (CH), Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US), University of San Diego (US), Georgetown University (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Georgetown University Medical Center (US), Yale Cancer Center (US), University of California San Diego (US), University of Chicago (US), Copper Development Association (US), Novartis (United States) (US), Flatiron Health (United States) (US), Tris Pharma (United States) (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
0.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.