Collective Consent to Xenotransplantation: A Critical Appraisal

Abstract Solid organ xenotransplantation may have the potential to help address the shortage of organs for transplantation. There is concern, however, that a novel zoonotic disease could be transmitted from the source organ to the human recipient, and then from the recipient to others. Theoretically, this could result in an epidemic or pandemic. Because of this potential risk, it has been argued that collective consent is required. Our goal is to critically evaluate the claim that collective consent is necessary for xenotransplantation to be ethically permissible. We argue that collective consent is not required and highlight the important roles of public engagement and due diligence in xenotransplant research moving forward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Health Ethics
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phae011
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Xenotransplantation and immune response
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collective Consent to Xenotransplantation: A Critical Appraisal

Christopher Alan Bobier, Daniel J. Hurst, Adam Omelianchuk, Daniel Rodger
3 citations
Public Health Ethics
Xenotransplantation and immune response
1.72
article

Collective Consent to Xenotransplantation: A Critical Appraisal

Christopher Alan Bobier, Daniel J. Hurst, Adam Omelianchuk, Daniel Rodger
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Solid organ xenotransplantation may have the potential to help address the shortage of organs for transplantation. There is concern, however, that a novel zoonotic disease could be transmitted from the source organ to the human recipient, and then from the recipient to others. Theoretically, this could result in an epidemic or pandemic. Because of this potential risk, it has been argued that collective consent is required. Our goal is to critically evaluate the claim that collective consent is necessary for xenotransplantation to be ethically permissible. We argue that collective consent is not required and highlight the important roles of public engagement and due diligence in xenotransplant research moving forward.

Public Health EthicsVol. 18(1)
Central Michigan University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), London South Bank University (GB), Rowan University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Xenotransplantation and immune response
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Collective Consent to Xenotransplantation: A Critical Appraisal — Christopher Alan Bobier, Daniel J. Hurst, et al. · Public Health Ethics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS