Determination of scales and measures for assessing social sustainability practices in construction projects

Purpose This paper addresses the scarcity of research on social sustainability (SS) in sustainable construction (SC) by establishing indicators and descriptors for SS throughout the construction project life cycle. The objective is to provide an objective assessment and improve SS practices. Design/methodology/approach The study employs a comprehensive methodology involving literature review, semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions and structured interviews. A total of 42 indicators were identified from the literature and presented to 20 expert panels, resulting in the addition of seven indicators. A refined set of 49 indicators was then presented to 25 experts via focus group discussions, and structured interviews were conducted to determine suitable descriptors and scales for each indicator. Findings The study identified 19 indicators for the pre-construction phase, 25 for the construction phase and 4 for the post-construction phase. These findings offer an objective assessment of SS practices across the construction project life cycle. The indicators and descriptors serve as a valuable tool for industry practitioners to monitor and improve social aspects, fostering SC. Research limitations/implications The study’s limitations include the context-specific nature of the findings and the potential subjectivity introduced through the selection of expert panels. Practical implications The identified indicators and descriptors have practical implications for industry practitioners, providing guidelines to enhance social sustainability practices throughout the project life cycle. Originality/value This study fills a research gap by focussing on SS in construction. The comprehensive methodology contributes to theory development and provides practical tools for practitioners to advance social sustainability practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-06-2023-0609
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determination of scales and measures for assessing social sustainability practices in construction projects

Sheila Belayutham, Che Khairil Izam Che Ibrahim, Nurul Elma Kordi
2 citations
Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
0.53
article

Determination of scales and measures for assessing social sustainability practices in construction projects

Sheila Belayutham, Che Khairil Izam Che Ibrahim, Nurul Elma Kordi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose This paper addresses the scarcity of research on social sustainability (SS) in sustainable construction (SC) by establishing indicators and descriptors for SS throughout the construction project life cycle. The objective is to provide an objective assessment and improve SS practices. Design/methodology/approach The study employs a comprehensive methodology involving literature review, semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions and structured interviews. A total of 42 indicators were identified from the literature and presented to 20 expert panels, resulting in the addition of seven indicators. A refined set of 49 indicators was then presented to 25 experts via focus group discussions, and structured interviews were conducted to determine suitable descriptors and scales for each indicator. Findings The study identified 19 indicators for the pre-construction phase, 25 for the construction phase and 4 for the post-construction phase. These findings offer an objective assessment of SS practices across the construction project life cycle. The indicators and descriptors serve as a valuable tool for industry practitioners to monitor and improve social aspects, fostering SC. Research limitations/implications The study’s limitations include the context-specific nature of the findings and the potential subjectivity introduced through the selection of expert panels. Practical implications The identified indicators and descriptors have practical implications for industry practitioners, providing guidelines to enhance social sustainability practices throughout the project life cycle. Originality/value This study fills a research gap by focussing on SS in construction. The comprehensive methodology contributes to theory development and provides practical tools for practitioners to advance social sustainability practices.

Engineering Construction & Architectural ManagementVol. 33(2)
Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.