Effective governance of marine recreational fisheries in Europe is needed to maximize the societal benefits of its fisheries

Abstract Marine recreational fishing (MRF) is a socially and economically relevant fishing activity in Europe, but its impacts on ecosystems and the economy remain poorly understood, and management is limited. This paper evaluates the current European fisheries governance, particularly the Common Fisheries Policy, in addressing MRF issues. Our evaluation highlights the lack of explicit recognition of MRF in European Union legislation, where recreational fisheries are not or insufficiently managed within a commercial fisheries-oriented policy framework. We recommend policy reform that explicitly recognizes recreational fisheries as a distinct fisheries sector with its own interests, values and objectives, and dynamics that differ from those typical in commercial fisheries. On the operational level, we recommend involving key organizations representing MRF interests in advisory groups dealing with marine fisheries, nature conservation, and marine spatial use, and encourage sustainable fishing practices among all types of fisheries. To achieve this, there is a need for better and more comprehensive data collection, stakeholder engagement, and outreach to support effective MRF governance and management. By addressing these issues, Europe can maximize the benefits of MRF, while ensuring the sustainability of fisheries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ICES Journal of Marine Science
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsae169
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effective governance of marine recreational fisheries in Europe is needed to maximize the societal benefits of its fisheries

Fabio Grati, Jon Helge Vølstad, Didzis Ustups, Jérôme Baudrier et al.
9 citations
ICES Journal of Marine Science
Coastal and Marine Management
6.39
article

Effective governance of marine recreational fisheries in Europe is needed to maximize the societal benefits of its fisheries

Fabio Grati, Jon Helge Vølstad, Didzis Ustups, Jérôme Baudrier, Christian Skov, Kieran Hyder, Brigid Bell, Luca Bolognini, Robert Arlinghaus, Kevin Haase, Zachary Radford, Harry V. Strehlow, Amélie Regimbart, Pablo Pita, Martina Scanu, Hugo Diogo, Warren M. Potts, Marc Simon Weltersbach, Thomas Verleye, Estanis Murgerza, Annica I De Groote
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract Marine recreational fishing (MRF) is a socially and economically relevant fishing activity in Europe, but its impacts on ecosystems and the economy remain poorly understood, and management is limited. This paper evaluates the current European fisheries governance, particularly the Common Fisheries Policy, in addressing MRF issues. Our evaluation highlights the lack of explicit recognition of MRF in European Union legislation, where recreational fisheries are not or insufficiently managed within a commercial fisheries-oriented policy framework. We recommend policy reform that explicitly recognizes recreational fisheries as a distinct fisheries sector with its own interests, values and objectives, and dynamics that differ from those typical in commercial fisheries. On the operational level, we recommend involving key organizations representing MRF interests in advisory groups dealing with marine fisheries, nature conservation, and marine spatial use, and encourage sustainable fishing practices among all types of fisheries. To achieve this, there is a need for better and more comprehensive data collection, stakeholder engagement, and outreach to support effective MRF governance and management. By addressing these issues, Europe can maximize the benefits of MRF, while ensuring the sustainability of fisheries.

ICES Journal of Marine ScienceVol. 82(2)
Universidade da Coruña (ES), University of East Anglia (GB), Universidade dos Açores (PT), Flanders Marine Institute (BE), Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (GB), Ifremer (FR), Rhodes University (ZA), Norwich Research Park (GB), Norwegian Institute of Marine Research (NO), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment “BIOR” (LV), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (DE), National Research Council (RO), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique (MQ), Ability Found (US), Institut de Ciències del Mar (ES), National Research Council (IT), L'Institut Agro (FR), University of Palermo (IT), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
UK Research and Innovation, Sight Research UK, European Commission, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Coastal and Marine Management
6.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.