Syrian Jihadis’ reaction to the Gaza conflict

This article examines the reactions of Jihadis and former Jihadis in Syria to the ongoing war on Gaza. This issue is significant because it highlights how groups that initially had a unified stance on the eve of the Syrian conflict in 2011—marked by their opposition to Muslim regimes and a Salafi outlook – later fractured during the Syrian conflict, leading to divergent positions on the war on Gaza. Global Jihadis, including al-Qaeda and Islamic State (IS), adopted very different stances. Al-Qaeda has attempted to soften its previous theological criticisms of Hamas with a cautious praise for the organization and timid attempts at promoting unity. In contrast, IS has remained vehemently opposed to Hamas, arguing that the group fights for non-religious reasons, allies with ‘enemies of Islam’, and does not seek to implement Islamic law. Perhaps the most intriguing perspective comes from former Jihadis, who view Hamas as a political and military model, although they are cautious about the Palestinian group’s praise for Iran and renewed links to the Syrian regime. This research argues that political considerations – such as the need to appeal to specific audiences and the dynamics of cross-factional competition – take precedence over theological concerns. Additionally, it finds that these divergent positions have not led to any violent actions from Syria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mediterranean Politics
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2024.2439697
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Syrian Jihadis’ reaction to the Gaza conflict

Jérôme Drevon
2 citations
Mediterranean Politics
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
2.26
article

Syrian Jihadis’ reaction to the Gaza conflict

Jérôme Drevon
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article examines the reactions of Jihadis and former Jihadis in Syria to the ongoing war on Gaza. This issue is significant because it highlights how groups that initially had a unified stance on the eve of the Syrian conflict in 2011—marked by their opposition to Muslim regimes and a Salafi outlook – later fractured during the Syrian conflict, leading to divergent positions on the war on Gaza. Global Jihadis, including al-Qaeda and Islamic State (IS), adopted very different stances. Al-Qaeda has attempted to soften its previous theological criticisms of Hamas with a cautious praise for the organization and timid attempts at promoting unity. In contrast, IS has remained vehemently opposed to Hamas, arguing that the group fights for non-religious reasons, allies with ‘enemies of Islam’, and does not seek to implement Islamic law. Perhaps the most intriguing perspective comes from former Jihadis, who view Hamas as a political and military model, although they are cautious about the Palestinian group’s praise for Iran and renewed links to the Syrian regime. This research argues that political considerations – such as the need to appeal to specific audiences and the dynamics of cross-factional competition – take precedence over theological concerns. Additionally, it finds that these divergent positions have not led to any violent actions from Syria.

Mediterranean PoliticsVol. 30(2)
United States Institute of Peace (US), Institute for Conflict Transformation and Peacebuilding (CZ), Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.