Facial occlusion with medical masks: Impacts on emotion recognition rates for emotion types and intensities

During the COVID-19 pandemic, mask-wearing became prominent or required worldwide as a predominant preventive strategy up until and even after vaccines became widely available. Because masks make emotion recognition more challenging for both the face and voice, medical and behavioural/mental health providers became aware of the disruptions this generated in practitioner-patient relationships. The current set of studies utilised two adult samples, first from United States college students (<i>N</i> = 516) and second from the U.S. American general public (<i>N</i> = 115), to document the severity and types of errors in facial expression recognition that were exacerbated by medical mask occlusion. Using a within-subjects experimental design and a well-validated test of emotion recognition that incorporated multiethnic adult facial stimuli, both studies found that happy, sad, and angry faces were significantly more difficult to interpret with masks than without, with lesser effects for fear. Both high- and low-intensity emotions were more difficult to interpret with masks, with a greater relative change for high-intensity emotions. The implications of these findings for medical and behavioural/mental health practitioners are briefly described, with emphasis on strategies that can be taken to mitigate the impact in health care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218241308569
Primary Topic
Infection Control and Ventilation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facial occlusion with medical masks: Impacts on emotion recognition rates for emotion types and intensities

Stephen Nowicki, Mike Woodcock, Virginia B. Wickline, Maria Grazia Strepparava et al.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Infection Control and Ventilation
article

Facial occlusion with medical masks: Impacts on emotion recognition rates for emotion types and intensities

Stephen Nowicki, Mike Woodcock, Virginia B. Wickline, Maria Grazia Strepparava, Selena Russo, Ashleigh Hall, Marco Bani, Ryan Lavrisa, Kaylee McCook
article en

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, mask-wearing became prominent or required worldwide as a predominant preventive strategy up until and even after vaccines became widely available. Because masks make emotion recognition more challenging for both the face and voice, medical and behavioural/mental health providers became aware of the disruptions this generated in practitioner-patient relationships. The current set of studies utilised two adult samples, first from United States college students (<i>N</i> = 516) and second from the U.S. American general public (<i>N</i> = 115), to document the severity and types of errors in facial expression recognition that were exacerbated by medical mask occlusion. Using a within-subjects experimental design and a well-validated test of emotion recognition that incorporated multiethnic adult facial stimuli, both studies found that happy, sad, and angry faces were significantly more difficult to interpret with masks than without, with lesser effects for fear. Both high- and low-intensity emotions were more difficult to interpret with masks, with a greater relative change for high-intensity emotions. The implications of these findings for medical and behavioural/mental health practitioners are briefly described, with emphasis on strategies that can be taken to mitigate the impact in health care settings.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental PsychologyVol. 78(11)
Emory University (US), Georgia Southern University (US), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Georgia Southern University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Infection Control and Ventilation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.