Orders of the Division of Labor: Self-reference in Organization Structures

Abstract As a consequence of a variety of dynamics that firms have to deal with, their structures are continually evolving. Some of the resulting patterns and structural properties, however, only become visible at a greater distance from the object of analysis. Thus, this paper analyzes organization structures – conceptualized as the way in which firms divide and institutionalize labor – in their long-term development and shapes the phenomenon of aggregating structural self-reference. This self-reference is decomposed into a taxonomy based on three orders of the division of labor (DoL), each with a corresponding division logic (efficiency , effectivity , and viability) and structural implementation method ( specialization, contextualization , and reflection ) that firms apply to cope with steadily-changing environmental conditions. Each of the three orders reflects a response to a distinct period of change conceptualized as different bundles of stimuli (the Taylorian , Schumpeterian , and VUCA ‘zeitgeist’) through which new orders of the division of labor emerged.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Sociology
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/joso-2024-0008
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Orders of the Division of Labor: Self-reference in Organization Structures

Norman Meisinger
1 citations
Journal of Organizational Sociology
Innovation and Knowledge Management
0.55
article

Orders of the Division of Labor: Self-reference in Organization Structures

Norman Meisinger
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract As a consequence of a variety of dynamics that firms have to deal with, their structures are continually evolving. Some of the resulting patterns and structural properties, however, only become visible at a greater distance from the object of analysis. Thus, this paper analyzes organization structures – conceptualized as the way in which firms divide and institutionalize labor – in their long-term development and shapes the phenomenon of aggregating structural self-reference. This self-reference is decomposed into a taxonomy based on three orders of the division of labor (DoL), each with a corresponding division logic (efficiency , effectivity , and viability) and structural implementation method ( specialization, contextualization , and reflection ) that firms apply to cope with steadily-changing environmental conditions. Each of the three orders reflects a response to a distinct period of change conceptualized as different bundles of stimuli (the Taylorian , Schumpeterian , and VUCA ‘zeitgeist’) through which new orders of the division of labor emerged.

Journal of Organizational SociologyVol. 3(1)
University of Bern (CH), Chemnitz University of Technology (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.