Lessons from pond creation and restoration projects in Europe

Pond ecosystems harbour substantial biodiversity and contribute to several ecosystem services as nature‐based solutions (NbS). Pond restoration and creation projects have been initiated to address these trends, yet while some insights are published, many remain within the expertise of practitioners and are not easily accessible. Moreover, papers synthesizing findings from multiple such projects to derive broad, universal conclusions are very much lacking. Here, we contacted pond creation and restoration practitioners that worked on recent pond restoration projects in Europe using a questionnaire. We reported which practices are currently most common and identified where current good practices might need to be modified. As expected, most projects targeted and monitored species and habitats protected under the European Union Birds Directive and Habitats Directive. Most projects focused on species as conservation targets, rather than the promotion of specific Natura 2000 habitats, pond ecosystem services or NbS. Several challenges were highlighted including funding limitations and stakeholder engagement difficulties. Recommendations included amending legal frameworks, improving connectivity among pondscapes for effective biodiversity conservation and implementing more systematic monitoring. This work illustrates how consultation of practitioners as stakeholders can generate insights that may remain hidden in typical monitoring reports.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14342
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lessons from pond creation and restoration projects in Europe

Laïla Rhazi, Lizaan de Necker, Bartłomiej Gołdyn, Margarita Florencio et al.
8 citations
Restoration Ecology
Environmental Conservation and Management
4.97
article

Lessons from pond creation and restoration projects in Europe

Laïla Rhazi, Lizaan de Necker, Bartłomiej Gołdyn, Margarita Florencio, Luc Brendonck, Bram Vanschoenwinkel
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Pond ecosystems harbour substantial biodiversity and contribute to several ecosystem services as nature‐based solutions (NbS). Pond restoration and creation projects have been initiated to address these trends, yet while some insights are published, many remain within the expertise of practitioners and are not easily accessible. Moreover, papers synthesizing findings from multiple such projects to derive broad, universal conclusions are very much lacking. Here, we contacted pond creation and restoration practitioners that worked on recent pond restoration projects in Europe using a questionnaire. We reported which practices are currently most common and identified where current good practices might need to be modified. As expected, most projects targeted and monitored species and habitats protected under the European Union Birds Directive and Habitats Directive. Most projects focused on species as conservation targets, rather than the promotion of specific Natura 2000 habitats, pond ecosystem services or NbS. Several challenges were highlighted including funding limitations and stakeholder engagement difficulties. Recommendations included amending legal frameworks, improving connectivity among pondscapes for effective biodiversity conservation and implementing more systematic monitoring. This work illustrates how consultation of practitioners as stakeholders can generate insights that may remain hidden in typical monitoring reports.

Restoration EcologyVol. 33(3)
Mohammed V University (MA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), North-West University (ZA), Estación Biológica de Doñana (ES), Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES), KU Leuven (BE)
Joint Programming Initiative Water challenges for a changing world, Biodiversa+, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Narodowe Centrum Nauki, Narodowym Centrum Nauki, Vlaamse regering, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Environmental Conservation and Management
4.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.