Co-creating or Confounding? Hybrid Legitimacy Evaluation of Circular Business Models in the U.K. Plastics Sector

Despite the importance of business models for enabling a circular economy at a systems level, little is known about how value chain actors assess the circular business models that they are co-creating and how this assessment shapes their behaviour. Framing circular business models as a subject of legitimacy, this study explores how value chain actors respond when the value proposition of a circular business model seems proper, but the value creation and capture are debated. Based on interviews and workshops with 16 U.K. plastics sector organizations, this study shows how value chain actors respond to this hybrid legitimacy judgement by assuming a position of dynamic vigilance. This position affects the advising, contributing, lobbying, and trialling work that actors do to shape emerging circular economy institutions. We argue that the actors’ dynamic vigilance and advocacy work might be impeding a circular economy and corresponding business models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organization & Environment
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266241300455
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-creating or Confounding? Hybrid Legitimacy Evaluation of Circular Business Models in the U.K. Plastics Sector

Adeyemi Adelekan, Maria Sharmina
3 citations
Organization & Environment
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
1.66
article

Co-creating or Confounding? Hybrid Legitimacy Evaluation of Circular Business Models in the U.K. Plastics Sector

Adeyemi Adelekan, Maria Sharmina
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Despite the importance of business models for enabling a circular economy at a systems level, little is known about how value chain actors assess the circular business models that they are co-creating and how this assessment shapes their behaviour. Framing circular business models as a subject of legitimacy, this study explores how value chain actors respond when the value proposition of a circular business model seems proper, but the value creation and capture are debated. Based on interviews and workshops with 16 U.K. plastics sector organizations, this study shows how value chain actors respond to this hybrid legitimacy judgement by assuming a position of dynamic vigilance. This position affects the advising, contributing, lobbying, and trialling work that actors do to shape emerging circular economy institutions. We argue that the actors’ dynamic vigilance and advocacy work might be impeding a circular economy and corresponding business models.

Organization & EnvironmentVol. 38(2)
University of Manchester (GB)
Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
1.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.