Utility of Aprepitant in the Management of Pediatric Patients with Cyclical Vomiting Syndrome

<b>Introduction</b>: Cyclical vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a recurrent debilitating illness characterized by intense episodes of nausea and emesis with widely varied pharmacological management across the country. Aprepitant is now increasingly used in patients with CVS. The impact of aprepitant as an abortive therapy in the readmission of pediatric patients with CVS is currently unknown. <b>Methodology</b>: We analyzed all pediatric patients with a primary diagnosis of CVS using the ICD-10 code in the Pediatric Health Information System database of the Children's Hospital Association. We evaluated the demographic data, comorbid conditions, and management details during the inpatient stay. CVS patients who received aprepitant during their inpatient hospitalization were compared with patients without aprepitant use. Seven-day readmission rate for CVS was used as the outcome variable to assess the effectiveness of the aprepitant in aborting an episode. Propensity score matching was used to match the two cohorts. <b>Results</b>: We analyzed 1775 patients of which 96 received aprepitant during the inpatient hospitalization. The aprepitant group had a more severe hospitalization course as evidenced by an increased duration of hospital stay (5 vs. 3 days) and total hospitalization costs ($11,790 vs. $6380). There were no significant differences in the 7-day (17% vs. 16%, <i>p</i> = 0.91) readmission rate and results were not altered by propensity score matching. <b>Conclusions</b>: Aprepitant use as an abortive therapy did not affect the 7-day CVS-related readmission rate. Further prospective studies are needed to explore the role of aprepitant as an abortive agent in the management of CVS in the pediatric population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicines
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines11080021
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utility of Aprepitant in the Management of Pediatric Patients with Cyclical Vomiting Syndrome

Aravind Thavamani, Jasmine Khatana, Sindhoosha Malay, Sujithra Velayuthan et al.
2 citations
Medicines
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
2.22
article

Utility of Aprepitant in the Management of Pediatric Patients with Cyclical Vomiting Syndrome

Aravind Thavamani, Jasmine Khatana, Sindhoosha Malay, Sujithra Velayuthan, Senthilkumar Sankararaman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Introduction</b>: Cyclical vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a recurrent debilitating illness characterized by intense episodes of nausea and emesis with widely varied pharmacological management across the country. Aprepitant is now increasingly used in patients with CVS. The impact of aprepitant as an abortive therapy in the readmission of pediatric patients with CVS is currently unknown. <b>Methodology</b>: We analyzed all pediatric patients with a primary diagnosis of CVS using the ICD-10 code in the Pediatric Health Information System database of the Children's Hospital Association. We evaluated the demographic data, comorbid conditions, and management details during the inpatient stay. CVS patients who received aprepitant during their inpatient hospitalization were compared with patients without aprepitant use. Seven-day readmission rate for CVS was used as the outcome variable to assess the effectiveness of the aprepitant in aborting an episode. Propensity score matching was used to match the two cohorts. <b>Results</b>: We analyzed 1775 patients of which 96 received aprepitant during the inpatient hospitalization. The aprepitant group had a more severe hospitalization course as evidenced by an increased duration of hospital stay (5 vs. 3 days) and total hospitalization costs ($11,790 vs. $6380). There were no significant differences in the 7-day (17% vs. 16%, <i>p</i> = 0.91) readmission rate and results were not altered by propensity score matching. <b>Conclusions</b>: Aprepitant use as an abortive therapy did not affect the 7-day CVS-related readmission rate. Further prospective studies are needed to explore the role of aprepitant as an abortive agent in the management of CVS in the pediatric population.

MedicinesVol. 11(8)
Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital (US), MetroHealth Medical Center (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
2.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.