Procedural Controls of the Inspection Undertaken by an Arbitral Tribunal for the Subject Matter of the Dispute

This study delves into the most important aspects of the procedures the arbitral tribunal should consider when inspecting the subject matter of the dispute. The main objective of such inspection is to derive evidence to render a decision for all or part of the parties’ claims, in the absence of the relevant rules under the Jordanian Arbitration Law and the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law for International Commercial Arbitration. Therefore, the study resorted to the Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration, the International Bar Association (IBA) has developed, which address the procedural controls for examination in a general sense. The authors also had recourse to the general procedural rules in the Jordanian law. The study concentrated on clarifying the legal basis of the procedural controls, the formality of preparing the inspection’s record, and the various procedural and financial stages of the inspection. The study also discussed the controls seeking assistance of the experts and witnesses in this respect. The study found that although the rules of the procedural controls of the inspection were not expressly provided, the failure to comply with such implied rules may expose the arbitral award to a procedural defect that may lead to the invalidity of such an award. Therefore, the study recommends that such controls should be regulated in the Jordanian Arbitration Law, the designated rules of each arbitration institution and centers and the UNCITRAL Model Law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jladah.ladr-1186
Citations
7
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Procedural Controls of the Inspection Undertaken by an Arbitral Tribunal for the Subject Matter of the Dispute

Noor Akief Al-Dabbas, Derar Al-Daboubi, Qais Enizan Al sharaiyri
7 citations
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
International Arbitration and Investment Law
3.88
article

Procedural Controls of the Inspection Undertaken by an Arbitral Tribunal for the Subject Matter of the Dispute

Noor Akief Al-Dabbas, Derar Al-Daboubi, Qais Enizan Al sharaiyri
article en
7 citations

Abstract

This study delves into the most important aspects of the procedures the arbitral tribunal should consider when inspecting the subject matter of the dispute. The main objective of such inspection is to derive evidence to render a decision for all or part of the parties’ claims, in the absence of the relevant rules under the Jordanian Arbitration Law and the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law for International Commercial Arbitration. Therefore, the study resorted to the Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration, the International Bar Association (IBA) has developed, which address the procedural controls for examination in a general sense. The authors also had recourse to the general procedural rules in the Jordanian law. The study concentrated on clarifying the legal basis of the procedural controls, the formality of preparing the inspection’s record, and the various procedural and financial stages of the inspection. The study also discussed the controls seeking assistance of the experts and witnesses in this respect. The study found that although the rules of the procedural controls of the inspection were not expressly provided, the failure to comply with such implied rules may expose the arbitral award to a procedural defect that may lead to the invalidity of such an award. Therefore, the study recommends that such controls should be regulated in the Jordanian Arbitration Law, the designated rules of each arbitration institution and centers and the UNCITRAL Model Law.

Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and ConstructionVol. 17(1)
Al-Ahliyya Amman University (JO), British University in Dubai (AE), Philadelphia University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
3.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.