Educational innovation in higher education: engineering students’ experiences of Emergency Remote Teaching

Research on concerns about Emergency Remote Teaching has focused on teaching and management strategies, with some studies considering learners’ satisfaction, reactions, learning and overall acceptance. The present case study, based on a survey on 3,183 undergraduate and postgraduate learners, aimed at investigating engineering students’ self-reported experiences of the Emergency Remote Teaching. It identified the empirical factors characterising such experience and the predictors of the students’ responses. Moreover, it focused on their reaction to the innovation in teaching and learning methodologies in an extreme scenario. Quantitative methods, like confirmatory factor analysis and factorial ANOVA, were adopted to analyse data. Our findings highlighted that engineering students assessed their overall online learning experience of Emergency Remote Teaching slightly negatively. This evaluation concerned their opinion about three factors which achieved different assessment. These results did not appear to depend on the learners’ gender or their educational level of degree study, while the academic year of attendance seemed to influence their opinion on teaching. Moreover, the change in the learning approach experienced in the passage from bachelor to master’s programmes was discovered to be a further predictor which might be more critical for females than males. Finally, implications for policy makers and higher education institutions for online learning in the post-pandemic scenario are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Education
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2437882
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Innovations and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Educational innovation in higher education: engineering students’ experiences of Emergency Remote Teaching

Juliana Elisa Raffaghelli, Roberto Mazzola, Matteo Bozzi, Susanna Sancassani et al.
1 citations
Cogent Education
Educational Innovations and Challenges
0.78
article

Educational innovation in higher education: engineering students’ experiences of Emergency Remote Teaching

Juliana Elisa Raffaghelli, Roberto Mazzola, Matteo Bozzi, Susanna Sancassani, Italo Testa, Maurizio Zani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Research on concerns about Emergency Remote Teaching has focused on teaching and management strategies, with some studies considering learners’ satisfaction, reactions, learning and overall acceptance. The present case study, based on a survey on 3,183 undergraduate and postgraduate learners, aimed at investigating engineering students’ self-reported experiences of the Emergency Remote Teaching. It identified the empirical factors characterising such experience and the predictors of the students’ responses. Moreover, it focused on their reaction to the innovation in teaching and learning methodologies in an extreme scenario. Quantitative methods, like confirmatory factor analysis and factorial ANOVA, were adopted to analyse data. Our findings highlighted that engineering students assessed their overall online learning experience of Emergency Remote Teaching slightly negatively. This evaluation concerned their opinion about three factors which achieved different assessment. These results did not appear to depend on the learners’ gender or their educational level of degree study, while the academic year of attendance seemed to influence their opinion on teaching. Moreover, the change in the learning approach experienced in the passage from bachelor to master’s programmes was discovered to be a further predictor which might be more critical for females than males. Finally, implications for policy makers and higher education institutions for online learning in the post-pandemic scenario are discussed.

Cogent EducationVol. 11(1)
University of Padua (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Educational Innovations and Challenges
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.