The impact of political risks on carbon emissions

We investigate the impact of firm-level political risks on carbon emissions. Our results show that companies decrease their total emission footprint in response to higher political risks. However, this is driven predominantly by the reduction of scope 2 emissions, which “involves purchased energy consumed by the firm.” With increasing policymakers, investors, and stakeholders' emphasis on positive climate change actions, our findings indicate that corporations may view reducing carbon emissions as an efficient strategy to draw attention away from higher political risks. Further analyses reveal that this tactic is adopted mainly by resource-constrained companies that are smaller, underperforming, with lower cash reserves and cashflow from operations. Using a channel test, we also provide empirical evidence that reducing scope 2 emissions in response to higher political risks may have helped firms avoid lower market valuation. Our findings are robust to a series of sensitivity and endogeneity checks. Overall, this study advances the literature by highlighting the interplay between politics and carbon emission in an increasingly climate change-focused environment. • Political risks have effects on carbon emissions at the firm level. • Companies reduce their carbon emissions to offset higher firm level political risks. • Firms predominantly reduce scope 2 emissions to decrease total emissions. • Resource-constrained companies are more likely to use this strategy. • Lowering emissions to offset political risk may help firms avoid lower market valuation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Economics
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108130
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of political risks on carbon emissions

Jin Boon Wong, Qin Zhang
3 citations
Energy Economics
Market Dynamics and Volatility
3.39
article

The impact of political risks on carbon emissions

Jin Boon Wong, Qin Zhang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We investigate the impact of firm-level political risks on carbon emissions. Our results show that companies decrease their total emission footprint in response to higher political risks. However, this is driven predominantly by the reduction of scope 2 emissions, which “involves purchased energy consumed by the firm.” With increasing policymakers, investors, and stakeholders' emphasis on positive climate change actions, our findings indicate that corporations may view reducing carbon emissions as an efficient strategy to draw attention away from higher political risks. Further analyses reveal that this tactic is adopted mainly by resource-constrained companies that are smaller, underperforming, with lower cash reserves and cashflow from operations. Using a channel test, we also provide empirical evidence that reducing scope 2 emissions in response to higher political risks may have helped firms avoid lower market valuation. Our findings are robust to a series of sensitivity and endogeneity checks. Overall, this study advances the literature by highlighting the interplay between politics and carbon emission in an increasingly climate change-focused environment. • Political risks have effects on carbon emissions at the firm level. • Companies reduce their carbon emissions to offset higher firm level political risks. • Firms predominantly reduce scope 2 emissions to decrease total emissions. • Resource-constrained companies are more likely to use this strategy. • Lowering emissions to offset political risk may help firms avoid lower market valuation.

Energy EconomicsVol. 141
Macquarie University (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.