Dependence of rainfall–runoff model performance on calibration conditions under changing climatic conditions

Calibration period selection is crucial for rainfall–runoff (RR) models in stationary and non-stationary climates. In this study, we assessed the impact of four calibration conditions on RR model performance: calibration duration, temporal lag between calibration and simulation periods, variation in rainfall volume, and rainfall patterns similarity. To ensure the generalizability of our findings, we used five RR models (GR4J, Simhyd, WASMOD, HBV, and XAJ) to simulate streamflow across two catchments in Iran with stationary and non-stationary climate conditions. Our results show that catchments exhibiting non-stationary RR relationships necessitate longer calibration periods to obtain stable simulations. Model performance gradually drops as the temporal lag between the calibration and simulation periods increases. This drop in performance is even more pronounced in catchments experiencing non-stationary climate conditions. Similarity in rainfall volume is more important than rainfall pattern similarity for predicting future streamflow in non-stationary RR relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrological Sciences Journal
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2024.2441325
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dependence of rainfall–runoff model performance on calibration conditions under changing climatic conditions

Martijn J. Booij, Afshin Jahanshahi, Sopan Patil
7 citations
Hydrological Sciences Journal
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.41
article

Dependence of rainfall–runoff model performance on calibration conditions under changing climatic conditions

Martijn J. Booij, Afshin Jahanshahi, Sopan Patil
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Calibration period selection is crucial for rainfall–runoff (RR) models in stationary and non-stationary climates. In this study, we assessed the impact of four calibration conditions on RR model performance: calibration duration, temporal lag between calibration and simulation periods, variation in rainfall volume, and rainfall patterns similarity. To ensure the generalizability of our findings, we used five RR models (GR4J, Simhyd, WASMOD, HBV, and XAJ) to simulate streamflow across two catchments in Iran with stationary and non-stationary climate conditions. Our results show that catchments exhibiting non-stationary RR relationships necessitate longer calibration periods to obtain stable simulations. Model performance gradually drops as the temporal lag between the calibration and simulation periods increases. This drop in performance is even more pronounced in catchments experiencing non-stationary climate conditions. Similarity in rainfall volume is more important than rainfall pattern similarity for predicting future streamflow in non-stationary RR relationships.

Hydrological Sciences JournalVol. 70(4)
Bangor University (GB), Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University (IR), University of Naples Federico II (IT), University of Twente (NL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.