Cerebral Visual Impairment Education: Training and Current Practice Patterns of Optometrists and Ophthalmologists

Introduction: Cerebral visual impairment (CVI) is the most common cause of visual impairment in developed nations. The purpose of this study was to understand the entry-level education and training received by optometrists and ophthalmologists, as well as current practice patterns. Methods: Online surveys were distributed to optometry and ophthalmology program directors and practicing optometrists and ophthalmologists. Data collection occurred between May 2020 and August 2020. Results: Surveys were completed by 48 program directors and 334 eye care professionals in North America, Europe, Oceania, and Asia, with most in North America. Less than half of the program directors reported (48%, 23/48) providing formal CVI didactic education. No program provided more than 2 hr of classroom instruction, 83% offered 1–2 hr, and 17% offered less than 1 hr. Although some clinical instruction was offered by 92% (44/48) of programs, exposure to patients with CVI occurred infrequently. Over one-half of the practitioners reported moderate familiarity with CVI. However, only 31% (102/334) of practitioners reported receiving formal classroom CVI instruction; of those, 56% (57/102) had 2 hr or less. Sixty-five percent (218/334) reported diagnosing children with CVI infrequently in their practices, with only 24% making CVI diagnoses on a daily or weekly basis. Discussion: Given the diverse and heterogenous characteristics of CVI, it is challenging to prepare future clinicians to evaluate and manage children with CVI with only 1–2 hr of lecture and minimal clinical exposure. This missed opportunity during formal education has significant implications for early diagnosis and timely intervention. To adequately prepare practitioners for comprehensive care of individuals with CVI, it is imperative to improve the quality and scope of didactic and clinical training. Implications for Practitioners: The results indicate the need for more comprehensive CVI education for optometrists and ophthalmologists during training as well as throughout practice with continuing education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x241297636
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cerebral Visual Impairment Education: Training and Current Practice Patterns of Optometrists and Ophthalmologists

Karen Harpster, Melissa Rice, Veeral Shah, Terry L. Schwartz et al.
1 citations
Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
0.39
article

Cerebral Visual Impairment Education: Training and Current Practice Patterns of Optometrists and Ophthalmologists

Karen Harpster, Melissa Rice, Veeral Shah, Terry L. Schwartz, J S Bulman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Cerebral visual impairment (CVI) is the most common cause of visual impairment in developed nations. The purpose of this study was to understand the entry-level education and training received by optometrists and ophthalmologists, as well as current practice patterns. Methods: Online surveys were distributed to optometry and ophthalmology program directors and practicing optometrists and ophthalmologists. Data collection occurred between May 2020 and August 2020. Results: Surveys were completed by 48 program directors and 334 eye care professionals in North America, Europe, Oceania, and Asia, with most in North America. Less than half of the program directors reported (48%, 23/48) providing formal CVI didactic education. No program provided more than 2 hr of classroom instruction, 83% offered 1–2 hr, and 17% offered less than 1 hr. Although some clinical instruction was offered by 92% (44/48) of programs, exposure to patients with CVI occurred infrequently. Over one-half of the practitioners reported moderate familiarity with CVI. However, only 31% (102/334) of practitioners reported receiving formal classroom CVI instruction; of those, 56% (57/102) had 2 hr or less. Sixty-five percent (218/334) reported diagnosing children with CVI infrequently in their practices, with only 24% making CVI diagnoses on a daily or weekly basis. Discussion: Given the diverse and heterogenous characteristics of CVI, it is challenging to prepare future clinicians to evaluate and manage children with CVI with only 1–2 hr of lecture and minimal clinical exposure. This missed opportunity during formal education has significant implications for early diagnosis and timely intervention. To adequately prepare practitioners for comprehensive care of individuals with CVI, it is imperative to improve the quality and scope of didactic and clinical training. Implications for Practitioners: The results indicate the need for more comprehensive CVI education for optometrists and ophthalmologists during training as well as throughout practice with continuing education.

Journal of Visual Impairment & BlindnessVol. 118(6)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.