Mammogram Reject Rate Analysis and Cause in Regional Hospitals in Saudi Arabia

Background: Technical repeats of mammograms cause increased radiation exposure to patients. Therefore, regular quality assurance needs to be established to ensure the standard of performance in any breast center. Reject/repeat (RA) analysis is a subjective evaluation of image quality where images judged to be of poor quality are categorized according to their cause. The aim of this study was to evaluate the total number of rejected mammograms, the most commonly repeated views, and the reasons in a regional hospital in Saudi Arabia. Method: Retrospective data collection was obtained from the Hologic Selenia Dimensions Digital Mammography System from 1. Sept 2021 to 31. August 2024. A ‘Reject Analysis’ report, including reject rates, rejection causes, rejected projections, and the total number of mammographic exposures, was retrieved from the machine itself. Anonymized, rejected images were then exported and analyzed by the researcher. Results: A total of 20792 exposures in the 3-year period were included in this study. There were 2475 repeat rejections, translating into an average reject rate of 11.9%. The most common reasons for repeat rejections were patient positioning, x-ray equipment failure, patient motion, and artifacts. Conclusion: The reported RR rate of 11.9% is well above the <3% acceptable level recommended by most international guidelines, and more research is required to reveal the underlying cause. We believe that regular mammography RA is an effective means for exposure reduction among mammography patients and to continuously improve training programs and maintain the quality and performances of many breast centers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Saudi Journal of Radiology
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55038/ec4dn910
Primary Topic
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mammogram Reject Rate Analysis and Cause in Regional Hospitals in Saudi Arabia

Laila Ashkar
Saudi Journal of Radiology
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
article

Mammogram Reject Rate Analysis and Cause in Regional Hospitals in Saudi Arabia

Laila Ashkar
article en

Abstract

Background: Technical repeats of mammograms cause increased radiation exposure to patients. Therefore, regular quality assurance needs to be established to ensure the standard of performance in any breast center. Reject/repeat (RA) analysis is a subjective evaluation of image quality where images judged to be of poor quality are categorized according to their cause. The aim of this study was to evaluate the total number of rejected mammograms, the most commonly repeated views, and the reasons in a regional hospital in Saudi Arabia. Method: Retrospective data collection was obtained from the Hologic Selenia Dimensions Digital Mammography System from 1. Sept 2021 to 31. August 2024. A ‘Reject Analysis’ report, including reject rates, rejection causes, rejected projections, and the total number of mammographic exposures, was retrieved from the machine itself. Anonymized, rejected images were then exported and analyzed by the researcher. Results: A total of 20792 exposures in the 3-year period were included in this study. There were 2475 repeat rejections, translating into an average reject rate of 11.9%. The most common reasons for repeat rejections were patient positioning, x-ray equipment failure, patient motion, and artifacts. Conclusion: The reported RR rate of 11.9% is well above the <3% acceptable level recommended by most international guidelines, and more research is required to reveal the underlying cause. We believe that regular mammography RA is an effective means for exposure reduction among mammography patients and to continuously improve training programs and maintain the quality and performances of many breast centers.

Saudi Journal of RadiologyVol. 3(RSSA)
King Abdulaziz University (SA)
King Abdulaziz University
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.