Multi-Segment and Single-Segment Sales Contests: Evidence of Their Effectiveness and the Underlying Mechanisms

Sales contests are vital motivational tools, yet their effectiveness remains unclear. This research provides valuable insights by examining two contest types: (1) single-segment contests, where a salesperson competes against all other salespeople, and (2) multi-segment contests, where salespeople are divided into homogeneous segments and compete only within their respective segments. The authors compare both contests using different theoretical lenses and integrate managerial insights. For the empirical assessment, the authors carried out a field experiment with two treatment groups, each participating in a different contest type, and a control group that did not participate in any contest. To strengthen the internal and external validity of the findings, they conducted four supplementary studies, which comprised two additional field studies and two experimental studies. Findings reveal that, on average, single-segment contests do not outperform a no-contest situation, whereas multi-segment contests enhance not only the average performance but also the performance across the segments. This performance improvement is mediated by a higher perceived chance of winning and motivation. Additionally, the authors compare multi-segment contests with “duel-style” contests, where a salesperson competes in one-on-one duels within the same segment. Results indicate that the former yields superior results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marketing Research
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437241307577
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Segment and Single-Segment Sales Contests: Evidence of Their Effectiveness and the Underlying Mechanisms

Raghu Bommaraju, Sebastian Hohenberg, S. Arunachalam
3 citations
Journal of Marketing Research
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
1.58
article

Multi-Segment and Single-Segment Sales Contests: Evidence of Their Effectiveness and the Underlying Mechanisms

Raghu Bommaraju, Sebastian Hohenberg, S. Arunachalam
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Sales contests are vital motivational tools, yet their effectiveness remains unclear. This research provides valuable insights by examining two contest types: (1) single-segment contests, where a salesperson competes against all other salespeople, and (2) multi-segment contests, where salespeople are divided into homogeneous segments and compete only within their respective segments. The authors compare both contests using different theoretical lenses and integrate managerial insights. For the empirical assessment, the authors carried out a field experiment with two treatment groups, each participating in a different contest type, and a control group that did not participate in any contest. To strengthen the internal and external validity of the findings, they conducted four supplementary studies, which comprised two additional field studies and two experimental studies. Findings reveal that, on average, single-segment contests do not outperform a no-contest situation, whereas multi-segment contests enhance not only the average performance but also the performance across the segments. This performance improvement is mediated by a higher perceived chance of winning and motivation. Additionally, the authors compare multi-segment contests with “duel-style” contests, where a salesperson competes in one-on-one duels within the same segment. Results indicate that the former yields superior results.

Journal of Marketing ResearchVol. 62(3)
Indian School of Business (IN), Texas Tech University (US), University of Münster (DE), FH Münster University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
1.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.