Influence of the temperature on the intrinsic parameters of thin-film photovoltaic modules

The electrical parameters, the ideality diode factor and the parasitic resistances of a photovoltaic module can be estimated from its current–voltage ( I–V ) curve. However, there are only very few studies focused on thin–film devices, that could have a thermal behavior different from crystalline silicon technologies. This study analyzes the variation of these parameters from a set of current–voltage curves of several commercial modules from different technologies: single–crystalline silicon (sc–Si), multi–crystalline silicon (mc–Si), amorphous silicon (a–Si), tandem of micro–crystalline silicon and amorphous silicon (a–Si/ μ c–Si), tandem of cadmium selenide and cadmium telluride (CdS/CdTe), and copper indium selenide (CIS). Most of the modules present a positive value for the current thermal coefficient ( α ), but the voltage and power temperature coefficients ( β and γ ) are negative in all the cases. With respect the series resistance ( R S ), it is significantly higher for the thin–film modules than for the crystalline silicon ones. Moreover, the thermal coefficient of the series resistance ( κ ) varies depending on the technology. Regarding the shunt resistance ( R S h ), it seems to be insensitive with respect the temperature for a small range. Finally, the diode ideality factor ( m ) seems to be constant for crystalline silicon whereas it depends on the temperature for thin–film. • Only a very few studies are focused on the evolution of the intrinsic parameters of thin–film devices. • This study analyzes the variation of these parameters from a set of I–V curves of several modules. • The thermal coefficient of the series resistance κ varies depending on the technology. • The shunt resistance seems to be insensitive with respect the temperature. • The diode ideality factor has a clear dependence on the cell temperature for thin-film technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renewable Energy
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.122068
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of the temperature on the intrinsic parameters of thin-film photovoltaic modules

Kari Lappalainen, Luis Enrique Garcia Marrero, G. Spagnuolo, Michel Piliougine
3 citations
Renewable Energy
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
0.31
article

Influence of the temperature on the intrinsic parameters of thin-film photovoltaic modules

Kari Lappalainen, Luis Enrique Garcia Marrero, G. Spagnuolo, Michel Piliougine
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The electrical parameters, the ideality diode factor and the parasitic resistances of a photovoltaic module can be estimated from its current–voltage ( I–V ) curve. However, there are only very few studies focused on thin–film devices, that could have a thermal behavior different from crystalline silicon technologies. This study analyzes the variation of these parameters from a set of current–voltage curves of several commercial modules from different technologies: single–crystalline silicon (sc–Si), multi–crystalline silicon (mc–Si), amorphous silicon (a–Si), tandem of micro–crystalline silicon and amorphous silicon (a–Si/ μ c–Si), tandem of cadmium selenide and cadmium telluride (CdS/CdTe), and copper indium selenide (CIS). Most of the modules present a positive value for the current thermal coefficient ( α ), but the voltage and power temperature coefficients ( β and γ ) are negative in all the cases. With respect the series resistance ( R S ), it is significantly higher for the thin–film modules than for the crystalline silicon ones. Moreover, the thermal coefficient of the series resistance ( κ ) varies depending on the technology. Regarding the shunt resistance ( R S h ), it seems to be insensitive with respect the temperature for a small range. Finally, the diode ideality factor ( m ) seems to be constant for crystalline silicon whereas it depends on the temperature for thin–film. • Only a very few studies are focused on the evolution of the intrinsic parameters of thin–film devices. • This study analyzes the variation of these parameters from a set of I–V curves of several modules. • The thermal coefficient of the series resistance κ varies depending on the technology. • The shunt resistance seems to be insensitive with respect the temperature. • The diode ideality factor has a clear dependence on the cell temperature for thin-film technologies.

Renewable EnergyVol. 240
University of Salerno (IT), Tampere University of Applied Sciences (FI), Tampere University (FI), Institute for Microelectronics and Microsystems (IT)
European Commission, Academy of Finland, Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, Horizon 2020
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
0.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.