Domain knowledge, ethical acumen, and query capabilities (DEQ): a framework for generative AI use in education and knowledge work

The increasing reliance on Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) among students and knowledge workers poses significant risks and raises integrity concerns, prompting some institutions to impose bans on its use. With scant research on a guided framework, strategies, and checklists for the utilization of GenAI, we propose a framework based on the expertise acquisition model, information retrieval theory, and deontological ethics theory, emphasizing the need for domain knowledge, query capabilities, and ethical acumen (DEQ). Using a ‘thing’ ethnography methodology with ChatGPT, we validated our framework, highlighting the importance of these competencies to mitigate risks, including the generation of factually incorrect and plagiarized content. Our findings suggest that while GenAI can drive innovation, its content should be used as a guiding tool to enhance critical thinking and reasoning, ultimately helping knowledge workers and students avoid plagiarism and maintain academic integrity. We discuss this novel framework and provide avenues for extending this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Education
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2439651
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Domain knowledge, ethical acumen, and query capabilities (DEQ): a framework for generative AI use in education and knowledge work

John Frimpong Manso, John Serbe Marfo, Pasty Asamoah, Abdul Samed Muntaka et al.
4 citations
Cogent Education
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.10
article

Domain knowledge, ethical acumen, and query capabilities (DEQ): a framework for generative AI use in education and knowledge work

John Frimpong Manso, John Serbe Marfo, Pasty Asamoah, Abdul Samed Muntaka, David Asamoah, Richard Boateng, Daniel Zokpe, Sheena Lovia Boateng
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The increasing reliance on Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) among students and knowledge workers poses significant risks and raises integrity concerns, prompting some institutions to impose bans on its use. With scant research on a guided framework, strategies, and checklists for the utilization of GenAI, we propose a framework based on the expertise acquisition model, information retrieval theory, and deontological ethics theory, emphasizing the need for domain knowledge, query capabilities, and ethical acumen (DEQ). Using a ‘thing’ ethnography methodology with ChatGPT, we validated our framework, highlighting the importance of these competencies to mitigate risks, including the generation of factually incorrect and plagiarized content. Our findings suggest that while GenAI can drive innovation, its content should be used as a guiding tool to enhance critical thinking and reasoning, ultimately helping knowledge workers and students avoid plagiarism and maintain academic integrity. We discuss this novel framework and provide avenues for extending this study.

Cogent EducationVol. 11(1)
University of Ghana (GH), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.