Opinions of Gynecologists About Indication and Technique of Perineoplasty

<b>Background.</b> Perineoplasty is a frequently performed procedure as part of prolapse surgery. Despite its frequent use, there is a lack of evidence on the optimal indication, surgical technique and adverse outcomes. We intended to gain insight into the current opinions on indications and techniques of perineoplasty among (uro)gynecologists worldwide. <b>Methods.</b> We conducted a survey among members of the International UroGynecological Association (IUGA) to objectify indications for perineoplasty and aspects of surgical technique. <b>Results.</b> A total of 114 urogynecologists responded, with 98% performing perineoplasty. A total of 85% of respondents aimed to approximate the bulbocavernosus muscle, whereas 27% aimed to include the puborectal muscle as well. A total of 86% of respondents used 1-4 resorbable sutures, especially vicryl 2/0 (39%) or vicryl 0 (52%). According to the respondents, a "wide genital hiatus at physical examination" (87%) and "subjective complaints of a wide genital hiatus" (84%) were considered good/excellent indications for perineoplasty, whereas "fecal incontinence", "apical prolapse" and "perineal pain" were absolutely/mostly not a good indication. Reasons to not perform perineoplasty were pelvic pain (59%) and dyspareunia (64%). Most responders underlined the need for more research on this topic (8.5 out of 10). <b>Conclusions.</b> Perineoplasty is a frequently performed procedure. There is a wide variation in the indications for and surgical techniques of perineoplasty. Therefore, research is needed to identify which patients will benefit from perineoplasty and how to optimally perform this surgery.