Assessing learning and development through transdisciplinary problem-based invention education offerings

Invention Education (IvE), a form of problem-based learning, presents new challenges for educational assessments in public schooling because traditional assessments were designed to evaluate learning in singular disciplines. This study explores the challenges and possibilities for assessing new knowledge and capabilities acquired through students’ engagement with multiple disciplines through IvE. Guided by constructivist and sociocultural theories, as well as an understanding of IvE principles and practices derived from the literature on IvE, we examine the phases of work within a national IvE program for high school students and educators. We then examine ways existing assessments align with the work at each stage of the IvE process. Findings from this case study underscore the need for a flexible assessment system with multiple measures (e.g., disciplinary knowledge and practices, skill inventories, etc.). The system must account for variations in learning contexts, individual and collective achievements, and varying lengths of time students engage in IvE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1306016
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing learning and development through transdisciplinary problem-based invention education offerings

Kelli Paul, Michelle Sullivan, Stephanie Couch, Sabiha Sultana
1 citations
Frontiers in Education
Biomedical and Engineering Education
0.18
article

Assessing learning and development through transdisciplinary problem-based invention education offerings

Kelli Paul, Michelle Sullivan, Stephanie Couch, Sabiha Sultana
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Invention Education (IvE), a form of problem-based learning, presents new challenges for educational assessments in public schooling because traditional assessments were designed to evaluate learning in singular disciplines. This study explores the challenges and possibilities for assessing new knowledge and capabilities acquired through students’ engagement with multiple disciplines through IvE. Guided by constructivist and sociocultural theories, as well as an understanding of IvE principles and practices derived from the literature on IvE, we examine the phases of work within a national IvE program for high school students and educators. We then examine ways existing assessments align with the work at each stage of the IvE process. Findings from this case study underscore the need for a flexible assessment system with multiple measures (e.g., disciplinary knowledge and practices, skill inventories, etc.). The system must account for variations in learning contexts, individual and collective achievements, and varying lengths of time students engage in IvE.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 9
University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Wellesley College (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Wellesley Centers for Women (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
0.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.