Assessment of Regional Brain Volume Measurements with Different Brain Extraction and Bias Field Correction Methods in Neonatal MRI

Proper selection and application of preprocessing steps are crucial for obtaining accurate segmentation in brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact brain extraction (BE) and bias field correction (BFC) methods have on regional brain volume (RBV) measurements of preterm neonates’ T2w MRI at term-equivalent age (TEA). Five BE methods (Manual, BET2, SWS, HD-BET, SynthStrip) were applied together with two BFC methods (SPM-BFC and N4ITK), before segmenting the neonatal brain into eight tissue classes (cortical grey matter, white matter, cerebral spinal fluid, deep nuclear grey matter, hippocampus, amygdala, cerebellum, and brainstem) using an automated segmentation software (MANTiS). Quantitative assessments were conducted, including the coefficient of variation (CV), coefficient of joint variation (CJV), Dice coefficient (DC), and RBV. HD-BET, together with N4ITK, showed the highest performance (mean ± standard deviation) regarding CV of 0.047 ± 0.005 (white matter) and 0.070 ± 0.005 (grey matter), CJV of 0.662 ± 0.095, DC of 0.942 ± 0.063, and RBV without significant differences (except in the brainstem) from the manual segmentation. Therefore, such combination of methods is recommended for improved skull-stripping accuracy, intensity homogeneity, and reproducibility of RBV of T2w MRI at TEA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app142411575
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Regional Brain Volume Measurements with Different Brain Extraction and Bias Field Correction Methods in Neonatal MRI

Hugo Alexandre Ferreira, Lena Hellström‐Westas, Tânia F. Vaz, Nima Naseh et al.
1 links
Applied Sciences
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

Assessment of Regional Brain Volume Measurements with Different Brain Extraction and Bias Field Correction Methods in Neonatal MRI

Hugo Alexandre Ferreira, Lena Hellström‐Westas, Tânia F. Vaz, Nima Naseh, Nuno Matela, Nuno Canto Moreira
article en

Abstract

Proper selection and application of preprocessing steps are crucial for obtaining accurate segmentation in brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact brain extraction (BE) and bias field correction (BFC) methods have on regional brain volume (RBV) measurements of preterm neonates’ T2w MRI at term-equivalent age (TEA). Five BE methods (Manual, BET2, SWS, HD-BET, SynthStrip) were applied together with two BFC methods (SPM-BFC and N4ITK), before segmenting the neonatal brain into eight tissue classes (cortical grey matter, white matter, cerebral spinal fluid, deep nuclear grey matter, hippocampus, amygdala, cerebellum, and brainstem) using an automated segmentation software (MANTiS). Quantitative assessments were conducted, including the coefficient of variation (CV), coefficient of joint variation (CJV), Dice coefficient (DC), and RBV. HD-BET, together with N4ITK, showed the highest performance (mean ± standard deviation) regarding CV of 0.047 ± 0.005 (white matter) and 0.070 ± 0.005 (grey matter), CJV of 0.662 ± 0.095, DC of 0.942 ± 0.063, and RBV without significant differences (except in the brainstem) from the manual segmentation. Therefore, such combination of methods is recommended for improved skull-stripping accuracy, intensity homogeneity, and reproducibility of RBV of T2w MRI at TEA.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(24)
Uppsala University (SE), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), University of Lisbon (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.