An optimized anisotropic pressure fluctuation model for the simulation of turbulence-induced vibrations

A significant aspect of the economic performance and safety of a nuclear reactor involves maintaining the integrity of the fuel rods, which are susceptible to Turbulence-Induced Vibrations (TIV) resulting from the axial flow of the coolant. TIV can instigate severe repercussions, including structural damage such as fatigue and wear. TIV can be studied numerically, using Fluid–Structure Interaction( FSI) simulations. However, high-resolution approaches are computationally too expensive to use for complex FSI simulations, while Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) simulations severely underpredict the displacement amplitudes of the vibrations as they only resolve the mean flow. Evolving from this shortfall, this paper focuses on a recently developed Anisotropic Pressure Fluctuation Model (AniPFM). This model generates a synthetic velocity fluctuations field, which is used to solve for the pressure fluctuations. Using this model, together with URANS, is a possible way to simulate the excitation mechanisms of TIV of fuel rods in a computationally cheaper way. While previous research has highlighted the potential of this model, there are parameters, definitions, and constants whose impacts on the model are not yet fully understood. Therefore, a comprehensive effort is undertaken to fine-tune the model, optimize its performance, improve understanding of it and further validate it. This is done by applying AniPFM to both pure flow and FSI cases, using high-resolution numerical and experimental data as reference and for comparison. With the optimized model, a substantial decrease in average difference from the experimental data is found for the FSI case under consideration, when compared with the unoptimized version of AniPFM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0235792
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An optimized anisotropic pressure fluctuation model for the simulation of turbulence-induced vibrations

S. Tajfirooz, E.M.A. Frederix, K. Zwijsen, A. van Zuijlen et al.
1 citations
Physics of Fluids
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
0.37
article

An optimized anisotropic pressure fluctuation model for the simulation of turbulence-induced vibrations

S. Tajfirooz, E.M.A. Frederix, K. Zwijsen, A. van Zuijlen, A. Marreiros de Freitas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A significant aspect of the economic performance and safety of a nuclear reactor involves maintaining the integrity of the fuel rods, which are susceptible to Turbulence-Induced Vibrations (TIV) resulting from the axial flow of the coolant. TIV can instigate severe repercussions, including structural damage such as fatigue and wear. TIV can be studied numerically, using Fluid–Structure Interaction( FSI) simulations. However, high-resolution approaches are computationally too expensive to use for complex FSI simulations, while Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) simulations severely underpredict the displacement amplitudes of the vibrations as they only resolve the mean flow. Evolving from this shortfall, this paper focuses on a recently developed Anisotropic Pressure Fluctuation Model (AniPFM). This model generates a synthetic velocity fluctuations field, which is used to solve for the pressure fluctuations. Using this model, together with URANS, is a possible way to simulate the excitation mechanisms of TIV of fuel rods in a computationally cheaper way. While previous research has highlighted the potential of this model, there are parameters, definitions, and constants whose impacts on the model are not yet fully understood. Therefore, a comprehensive effort is undertaken to fine-tune the model, optimize its performance, improve understanding of it and further validate it. This is done by applying AniPFM to both pure flow and FSI cases, using high-resolution numerical and experimental data as reference and for comparison. With the optimized model, a substantial decrease in average difference from the experimental data is found for the FSI case under consideration, when compared with the unoptimized version of AniPFM.

Physics of FluidsVol. 36(12)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Télécom Paris (FR), Université Sorbonne Nouvelle (FR), Laboratoire Traitement et Communication de l’Information (FR), Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Euratom Research and Training Programme, HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.