Comparison of the molecular FluoroType Mycobacteria VER 1.0 and the Maldi BioTyper Mycobacteria assays for the identification of non-tuberculous mycobacteria

Accurate identification of non-tuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) species is crucial for the diagnosis and appropriate management of NTM infections. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of two assays, FluoroType Mycobacteria VER 1.0 and Maldi BioTyper (MBT) Mycobacteria. The two assays were evaluated using 119 NTM, including 85 slow-growing mycobacteria and 34 rapid-growing mycobacteria, representing a total of 33 species isolated in three French clinical laboratories. We used the GenoType assays as reference method for species identification, followed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing if the GenoType kits returned <i>Mycobacterium</i> sp. Compared to the reference method, the FluoroType Mycobacteria assay provided correct species identification in 89.9% of cases (107/119). Among the most frequently encountered species in clinical settings, low concordance was obtained for <i>Mycobacterium intracellulare</i> (82.4%, 14/17), <i>Mycobacterium gordonae</i> (66.7%, 6/9), and <i>Mycobacterium xenopi</i> (75%, 6/8). Misidentification was obtained in two cases (<i>Mycobacterium smegmatis</i> instead of <i>Mycobacterium mageritense</i>, and <i>Mycobacterium mucogenicum</i> instead of <i>Mycobacterium phocaicum</i>). Using the MBT Mycobacteria assay, 78.1% (93/119) of NTM isolates were correctly identified at the species level. One <i>Mycobacterium europaeum</i> isolate was misidentified as <i>M. intracellulare</i>/<i>Mycobacterium chimaera</i>. In five cases, the assay provided more accurate NTM identification compared to GenoType assays, in which closely related species are identified as a group. The FluoroType Mycobacteria VER 1.0 and the MBT Mycobacteria assays are useful tools for NTM identification from positive cultures, reducing handling time compared to GenoType assays. Their routine use in laboratories must take into consideration their performance and limitations in clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01206-24
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the molecular FluoroType Mycobacteria VER 1.0 and the Maldi BioTyper Mycobacteria assays for the identification of non-tuberculous mycobacteria

Jennifer Guiraud, Christine Lafuente, Cécilia Enault, Olivia Peuchant et al.
4 citations
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
1.55
article

Comparison of the molecular FluoroType Mycobacteria VER 1.0 and the Maldi BioTyper Mycobacteria assays for the identification of non-tuberculous mycobacteria

Jennifer Guiraud, Christine Lafuente, Cécilia Enault, Olivia Peuchant, Armelle Ménard, Caroline Piau, Emilie Nkpa Charron, Danièle Ducos
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Accurate identification of non-tuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) species is crucial for the diagnosis and appropriate management of NTM infections. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of two assays, FluoroType Mycobacteria VER 1.0 and Maldi BioTyper (MBT) Mycobacteria. The two assays were evaluated using 119 NTM, including 85 slow-growing mycobacteria and 34 rapid-growing mycobacteria, representing a total of 33 species isolated in three French clinical laboratories. We used the GenoType assays as reference method for species identification, followed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing if the GenoType kits returned <i>Mycobacterium</i> sp. Compared to the reference method, the FluoroType Mycobacteria assay provided correct species identification in 89.9% of cases (107/119). Among the most frequently encountered species in clinical settings, low concordance was obtained for <i>Mycobacterium intracellulare</i> (82.4%, 14/17), <i>Mycobacterium gordonae</i> (66.7%, 6/9), and <i>Mycobacterium xenopi</i> (75%, 6/8). Misidentification was obtained in two cases (<i>Mycobacterium smegmatis</i> instead of <i>Mycobacterium mageritense</i>, and <i>Mycobacterium mucogenicum</i> instead of <i>Mycobacterium phocaicum</i>). Using the MBT Mycobacteria assay, 78.1% (93/119) of NTM isolates were correctly identified at the species level. One <i>Mycobacterium europaeum</i> isolate was misidentified as <i>M. intracellulare</i>/<i>Mycobacterium chimaera</i>. In five cases, the assay provided more accurate NTM identification compared to GenoType assays, in which closely related species are identified as a group. The FluoroType Mycobacteria VER 1.0 and the MBT Mycobacteria assays are useful tools for NTM identification from positive cultures, reducing handling time compared to GenoType assays. Their routine use in laboratories must take into consideration their performance and limitations in clinical settings.

Journal of Clinical MicrobiologyVol. 63(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Inserm (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR), Centre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et Technique (CNRST) (MA), Bordeaux Population Health (FR), Groupe Hospitalier Cochin - Port-Royal, Hôtel-Dieu, Broca - La Collégiale (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes (FR), Laboratoire de Microbiologie Fondamentale et Pathogénicité (FR), BoRdeaux Institute of onCology (FR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
1.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.