Public Administration Reconstruction and Development in Post-conflict States: A Critique of Global Trends and Experiences

Abstract The absence of peace, stability, and solidity in many states globally negatively impacts sustainable development, notably the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The volatility and instability extend beyond the individual state and to neighboring states, not forgetting the region and continent. Weak/failed and post-conflict states are considered a possible danger and threat to universal safety. Consequently, their rebuilding and transformation should be prioritized in the broader international growth/development context. This viewpoint and thinking ushered in an international accord that conclusively decided that peace and stability are vital and indispensable for global development and are critical to the 2030 international growth and development framework. It was packaged and approved as an integral part of the SDGs in 2015 by the United Nations (UN). SDG 16 endorses sustainable development through peaceful/inclusive societies, developing efficacious inclusive/accountable structures at all governmental spheres and granting access to justice. SDG 16 alludes to sustainable development not being promoted and achieved without peace/harmony. Likewise, peace and harmony cannot be attained without sustainable development. In the context of collective growth/development and a global vision of “leaving no – one behind,” it is critical that good, robust post-conflict reconstruction and development is vigorously promoted with a view to a better life for all. The research methodology adopted for this paper was qualitative, as it included a desktop study of pertinent international and continental literature, including, among other things, books/chapters in books, journal articles and reports and other publications of the international donor community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2024-0016
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Administration Reconstruction and Development in Post-conflict States: A Critique of Global Trends and Experiences

P.S. Reddy
NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

Public Administration Reconstruction and Development in Post-conflict States: A Critique of Global Trends and Experiences

P.S. Reddy
article en

Abstract

Abstract The absence of peace, stability, and solidity in many states globally negatively impacts sustainable development, notably the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The volatility and instability extend beyond the individual state and to neighboring states, not forgetting the region and continent. Weak/failed and post-conflict states are considered a possible danger and threat to universal safety. Consequently, their rebuilding and transformation should be prioritized in the broader international growth/development context. This viewpoint and thinking ushered in an international accord that conclusively decided that peace and stability are vital and indispensable for global development and are critical to the 2030 international growth and development framework. It was packaged and approved as an integral part of the SDGs in 2015 by the United Nations (UN). SDG 16 endorses sustainable development through peaceful/inclusive societies, developing efficacious inclusive/accountable structures at all governmental spheres and granting access to justice. SDG 16 alludes to sustainable development not being promoted and achieved without peace/harmony. Likewise, peace and harmony cannot be attained without sustainable development. In the context of collective growth/development and a global vision of “leaving no – one behind,” it is critical that good, robust post-conflict reconstruction and development is vigorously promoted with a view to a better life for all. The research methodology adopted for this paper was qualitative, as it included a desktop study of pertinent international and continental literature, including, among other things, books/chapters in books, journal articles and reports and other publications of the international donor community.

NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and PolicyVol. 17(2)
University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.