Exploring Milky Way rotation curves with Gaia DR3: a comparison between ΛCDM, MOND, and general relativistic approaches

Abstract With the release of Gaia DR3, we extend the comparison between dynamical models for the Milky Way rotation curve initiated in the previous work. Utilising astrometric and spectro-photometric data for 719143 young disc stars within | z | < 1 kpc and up to R ≃ 19 kpc, we investigate the accuracy of MOND and ΛCDM frameworks in addition to previously studied models, such as the classical one with a Navarro-Frenk-White dark matter halo and a general relativistic model. We find that all models, including MOND and ΛCDM, are statistically equivalent in representing the observed rotational velocities. However, ΛCDM, characterized by an Einasto density profile and cosmological constraints on its parameters, assigns more dark matter than the model featuring a Navarro-Frenk-White profile, with the virial mass estimated at 1.5–2.5 × 10 12 M ⊙ — a value significantly higher than recent literature estimates. Beyond 10–15 kpc, non-Newtonian/non-baryonic contributions to the rotation curve are found to become dominant for all models consistently. Our results suggest the need for further exploration into the role of General Relativity, dark matter, and alternative theories of gravitational dynamics in shaping Milky Way's rotation curve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/12/024
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Milky Way rotation curves with Gaia DR3: a comparison between ΛCDM, MOND, and general relativistic approaches

M. G. Lattanzi, M. Crosta, W. Beordo
1 citations
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
0.33
article

Exploring Milky Way rotation curves with Gaia DR3: a comparison between ΛCDM, MOND, and general relativistic approaches

M. G. Lattanzi, M. Crosta, W. Beordo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract With the release of Gaia DR3, we extend the comparison between dynamical models for the Milky Way rotation curve initiated in the previous work. Utilising astrometric and spectro-photometric data for 719143 young disc stars within | z | < 1 kpc and up to R ≃ 19 kpc, we investigate the accuracy of MOND and ΛCDM frameworks in addition to previously studied models, such as the classical one with a Navarro-Frenk-White dark matter halo and a general relativistic model. We find that all models, including MOND and ΛCDM, are statistically equivalent in representing the observed rotational velocities. However, ΛCDM, characterized by an Einasto density profile and cosmological constraints on its parameters, assigns more dark matter than the model featuring a Navarro-Frenk-White profile, with the virial mass estimated at 1.5–2.5 × 10 12 M ⊙ — a value significantly higher than recent literature estimates. Beyond 10–15 kpc, non-Newtonian/non-baryonic contributions to the rotation curve are found to become dominant for all models consistently. Our results suggest the need for further exploration into the role of General Relativity, dark matter, and alternative theories of gravitational dynamics in shaping Milky Way's rotation curve.

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle PhysicsVol. 2024(12)
Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino (IT), University of Turin (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.