Comparative Analysis of Active and Passive Cell Balancing Strategies in Battery Management Systems

Battery management systems (BMS) play a crucial role in ensuring the performance, reliability, and longevity of modern battery systems by employing cell balancing techniques. This paper presents a comparative study of active and passive cell balancing strategies, focusing on balancing speed, energy dissipation, thermal effects, and State of Health (SoH). Passive balancing methods, utilizing resistive dissipation, are simple and cost-effective but suffer from low efficiency and significant energy loss as heat. Active balancing, on the other hand, redistributes energy between cells using converters, offering superior performance and energy efficiency but at a higher cost and complexity. Simulation models were developed in MATLAB/Simulink to evaluate both strategies under various conditions. For passive balancing, resistances of 1 Ω, 0.5 Ω, and 0.1 Ω were used, while active balancing employed a buck-boost converter with MOSFETs. The results demonstrated that active balancing achieved faster SOC (State of Charge) equilibrium with minimal energy dissipation. However, low-resistance passive balancing (e.g., 0.1 Ω) offered comparable balancing speed at the expense of increased thermal impact. A thermal analysis was conducted to evaluate dynamic temperature changes during operation, incorporating aging and environmental factors, which revealed their significant influence on battery performance and SoH degradation. Additionally, a mathematical scaling approach was applied to extrapolate the findings from a two-cell model to larger systems, providing insights into the scalability of both techniques. The study concluded that active balancing is ideal for high-performance applications requiring efficiency and speed, while passive balancing remains viable for cost-sensitive systems with lower performance requirements. This research highlights the trade-offs between energy efficiency, thermal stability, and complexity in cell balancing, offering valuable guidance for the design and optimization of BMS across various applications

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-22689
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Active and Passive Cell Balancing Strategies in Battery Management Systems

Kiran M. Kimmatkar, Manjeet Sakhare, Anurudha Gedam
4 citations
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.81
article

Comparative Analysis of Active and Passive Cell Balancing Strategies in Battery Management Systems

Kiran M. Kimmatkar, Manjeet Sakhare, Anurudha Gedam
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Battery management systems (BMS) play a crucial role in ensuring the performance, reliability, and longevity of modern battery systems by employing cell balancing techniques. This paper presents a comparative study of active and passive cell balancing strategies, focusing on balancing speed, energy dissipation, thermal effects, and State of Health (SoH). Passive balancing methods, utilizing resistive dissipation, are simple and cost-effective but suffer from low efficiency and significant energy loss as heat. Active balancing, on the other hand, redistributes energy between cells using converters, offering superior performance and energy efficiency but at a higher cost and complexity. Simulation models were developed in MATLAB/Simulink to evaluate both strategies under various conditions. For passive balancing, resistances of 1 Ω, 0.5 Ω, and 0.1 Ω were used, while active balancing employed a buck-boost converter with MOSFETs. The results demonstrated that active balancing achieved faster SOC (State of Charge) equilibrium with minimal energy dissipation. However, low-resistance passive balancing (e.g., 0.1 Ω) offered comparable balancing speed at the expense of increased thermal impact. A thermal analysis was conducted to evaluate dynamic temperature changes during operation, incorporating aging and environmental factors, which revealed their significant influence on battery performance and SoH degradation. Additionally, a mathematical scaling approach was applied to extrapolate the findings from a two-cell model to larger systems, providing insights into the scalability of both techniques. The study concluded that active balancing is ideal for high-performance applications requiring efficiency and speed, while passive balancing remains viable for cost-sensitive systems with lower performance requirements. This research highlights the trade-offs between energy efficiency, thermal stability, and complexity in cell balancing, offering valuable guidance for the design and optimization of BMS across various applications

International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology
Nagpur Institute of Technology (IN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.