Hidden strangeness in meson weak decays to baryon pair

Our study focuses on the weak decay of <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msubsup><a:mi>D</a:mi><a:mi>s</a:mi><a:mo>+</a:mo></a:msubsup><a:mo stretchy="false">→</a:mo><a:mi>p</a:mi><a:mover accent="true"><a:mi>n</a:mi><a:mo stretchy="false">¯</a:mo></a:mover></a:math>, which is the only possible two-body baryonic decay in the <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><f:mi>D</f:mi></f:math> meson system. An analysis using perturbative quantum chromodynamics (pQCD) is challenging in this decay due to the small amount of energy released. In particular, naive factorization, suppressed by the light quark masses, results in a minor contribution to this channel. In the framework of final state interactions, the hidden strangeness in the intermediate state naturally avoids this chiral suppression from light quark masses. The branching fraction is predicted to be <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><h:mi mathvariant="script">B</h:mi><h:mo stretchy="false">(</h:mo><h:msubsup><h:mi>D</h:mi><h:mi>s</h:mi><h:mo>+</h:mo></h:msubsup><h:mo stretchy="false">→</h:mo><h:mi>p</h:mi><h:mover accent="true"><h:mi>n</h:mi><h:mo stretchy="false">¯</h:mo></h:mover><h:mo stretchy="false">)</h:mo><h:mo>=</h:mo><h:mo stretchy="false">(</h:mo><h:mn>1.43</h:mn><h:mo>±</h:mo><h:mn>0.10</h:mn><h:mo stretchy="false">)</h:mo><h:mo>×</h:mo><h:msup><h:mn>10</h:mn><h:mrow><h:mo>−</h:mo><h:mn>3</h:mn></h:mrow></h:msup></h:math>, in agreement with the experimental value of <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><r:mo stretchy="false">(</r:mo><r:mn>1.22</r:mn><r:mo>±</r:mo><r:mn>0.11</r:mn><r:mo stretchy="false">)</r:mo><r:mo>×</r:mo><r:msup><r:mn>10</r:mn><r:mrow><r:mo>−</r:mo><r:mn>3</r:mn></r:mrow></r:msup></r:math>. We also analyze the decays of <v:math xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><v:mi>B</v:mi></v:math> mesons into two charmed baryons involving annihilation-type topological diagrams. In these decays, we conduct a joint analysis of naive factorization and final state interactions. Using the experimental upper bound of <x:math xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><x:mi mathvariant="script">B</x:mi><x:mo stretchy="false">(</x:mo><x:msubsup><x:mi>B</x:mi><x:mi>s</x:mi><x:mn>0</x:mn></x:msubsup><x:mo stretchy="false">→</x:mo><x:msubsup><x:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</x:mi><x:mi>c</x:mi><x:mo>+</x:mo></x:msubsup><x:msubsup><x:mover accent="true"><x:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</x:mi><x:mo stretchy="false">¯</x:mo></x:mover><x:mi>c</x:mi><x:mo>−</x:mo></x:msubsup><x:mo stretchy="false">)</x:mo><x:mo>&lt;</x:mo><x:mn>8</x:mn><x:mo>×</x:mo><x:msup><x:mn>10</x:mn><x:mrow><x:mo>−</x:mo><x:mn>5</x:mn></x:mrow></x:msup></x:math>, we set a constraint on the coupling constant <hb:math xmlns:hb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><hb:msub><hb:mi>g</hb:mi><hb:mrow><hb:msup><hb:mi>D</hb:mi><hb:mo>+</hb:mo></hb:msup><hb:msubsup><hb:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</hb:mi><hb:mi>c</hb:mi><hb:mo>+</hb:mo></hb:msubsup><hb:mi>n</hb:mi></hb:mrow></hb:msub><hb:mo>&lt;</hb:mo><hb:mn>7.5</hb:mn></hb:math>. Final state interactions lead to a prediction of the decay parameter <kb:math xmlns:kb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><kb:mi>γ</kb:mi><kb:mo stretchy="false">(</kb:mo><kb:msubsup><kb:mi>B</kb:mi><kb:mi>s</kb:mi><kb:mn>0</kb:mn></kb:msubsup><kb:mo stretchy="false">→</kb:mo><kb:msubsup><kb:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</kb:mi><kb:mi>c</kb:mi><kb:mo>+</kb:mo></kb:msubsup><kb:msubsup><kb:mover accent="true"><kb:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</kb:mi><kb:mo stretchy="false">¯</kb:mo></kb:mover><kb:mi>c</kb:mi><kb:mo>−</kb:mo></kb:msubsup><kb:mo stretchy="false">)</kb:mo><kb:mo>&gt;</kb:mo><kb:mn>0.8</kb:mn></kb:math>, whereas pQCD predicts it to be negative. We propose future measurements of <tb:math xmlns:tb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><tb:msup><tb:mi>B</tb:mi><tb:mn>0</tb:mn></tb:msup><tb:mo stretchy="false">→</tb:mo><tb:msubsup><tb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</tb:mi><tb:mi>c</tb:mi><tb:mo>+</tb:mo></tb:msubsup><tb:msubsup><tb:mover accent="true"><tb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</tb:mi><tb:mo stretchy="false">¯</tb:mo></tb:mover><tb:mi>c</tb:mi><tb:mo>−</tb:mo></tb:msubsup></tb:math>, predicting a significant <ac:math xmlns:ac="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ac:mi>S</ac:mi><ac:mi>U</ac:mi><ac:mo stretchy="false">(</ac:mo><ac:mn>3</ac:mn><ac:msub><ac:mo stretchy="false">)</ac:mo><ac:mi>F</ac:mi></ac:msub></ac:math> breaking effect with <ec:math xmlns:ec="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ec:mfrac><ec:mrow><ec:mi mathvariant="script">B</ec:mi><ec:mo stretchy="false">(</ec:mo><ec:msup><ec:mi>B</ec:mi><ec:mn>0</ec:mn></ec:msup><ec:mo stretchy="false">→</ec:mo><ec:msubsup><ec:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</ec:mi><ec:mi>c</ec:mi><ec:mo stretchy="false">+</ec:mo></ec:msubsup><ec:msubsup><ec:mover accent="true"><ec:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</ec:mi><ec:mo stretchy="false">¯</ec:mo></ec:mover><ec:mi>c</ec:mi><ec:mo stretchy="false">−</ec:mo></ec:msubsup><ec:mo stretchy="false">)</ec:mo></ec:mrow><ec:mrow><ec:mi mathvariant="script">B</ec:mi><ec:mo stretchy="false">(</ec:mo><ec:msubsup><ec:mi>B</ec:mi><ec:mi>s</ec:mi><ec:mn>0</ec:mn></ec:msubsup><ec:mo stretchy="false">→</ec:mo><ec:msubsup><ec:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</ec:mi><ec:mi>c</ec:mi><ec:mo stretchy="false">+</ec:mo></ec:msubsup><ec:msubsup><ec:mover accent="true"><ec:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</ec:mi><ec:mo stretchy="false">¯</ec:mo></ec:mover><ec:mi>c</ec:mi><ec:mo stretchy="false">−</ec:mo></ec:msubsup><ec:mo stretchy="false">)</ec:mo></ec:mrow></ec:mfrac><ec:mo>=</ec:mo><ec:mn>1.4</ec:mn><ec:mo>%</ec:mo></ec:math>, contrary to the naive estimate of 5.3%. We strongly recommend future measurements. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.110.113008
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hidden strangeness in meson weak decays to baryon pair

Xiang-Nan Jin, Chao-Qiang Geng, Chia-Wei Liu, Xiao Yu
2 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
1.32
article

Hidden strangeness in meson weak decays to baryon pair

Xiang-Nan Jin, Chao-Qiang Geng, Chia-Wei Liu, Xiao Yu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Our study focuses on the weak decay of <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msubsup><a:mi>D</a:mi><a:mi>s</a:mi><a:mo>+</a:mo></a:msubsup><a:mo stretchy="false">→</a:mo><a:mi>p</a:mi><a:mover accent="true"><a:mi>n</a:mi><a:mo stretchy="false">¯</a:mo></a:mover></a:math>, which is the only possible two-body baryonic decay in the <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><f:mi>D</f:mi></f:math> meson system. An analysis using perturbative quantum chromodynamics (pQCD) is challenging in this decay due to the small amount of energy released. In particular, naive factorization, suppressed by the light quark masses, results in a minor contribution to this channel. In the framework of final state interactions, the hidden strangeness in the intermediate state naturally avoids this chiral suppression from light quark masses. The branching fraction is predicted to be <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><h:mi mathvariant="script">B</h:mi><h:mo stretchy="false">(</h:mo><h:msubsup><h:mi>D</h:mi><h:mi>s</h:mi><h:mo>+</h:mo></h:msubsup><h:mo stretchy="false">→</h:mo><h:mi>p</h:mi><h:mover accent="true"><h:mi>n</h:mi><h:mo stretchy="false">¯</h:mo></h:mover><h:mo stretchy="false">)</h:mo><h:mo>=</h:mo><h:mo stretchy="false">(</h:mo><h:mn>1.43</h:mn><h:mo>±</h:mo><h:mn>0.10</h:mn><h:mo stretchy="false">)</h:mo><h:mo>×</h:mo><h:msup><h:mn>10</h:mn><h:mrow><h:mo>−</h:mo><h:mn>3</h:mn></h:mrow></h:msup></h:math>, in agreement with the experimental value of <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><r:mo stretchy="false">(</r:mo><r:mn>1.22</r:mn><r:mo>±</r:mo><r:mn>0.11</r:mn><r:mo stretchy="false">)</r:mo><r:mo>×</r:mo><r:msup><r:mn>10</r:mn><r:mrow><r:mo>−</r:mo><r:mn>3</r:mn></r:mrow></r:msup></r:math>. We also analyze the decays of <v:math xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><v:mi>B</v:mi></v:math> mesons into two charmed baryons involving annihilation-type topological diagrams. In these decays, we conduct a joint analysis of naive factorization and final state interactions. Using the experimental upper bound of <x:math xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><x:mi mathvariant="script">B</x:mi><x:mo stretchy="false">(</x:mo><x:msubsup><x:mi>B</x:mi><x:mi>s</x:mi><x:mn>0</x:mn></x:msubsup><x:mo stretchy="false">→</x:mo><x:msubsup><x:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</x:mi><x:mi>c</x:mi><x:mo>+</x:mo></x:msubsup><x:msubsup><x:mover accent="true"><x:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</x:mi><x:mo stretchy="false">¯</x:mo></x:mover><x:mi>c</x:mi><x:mo>−</x:mo></x:msubsup><x:mo stretchy="false">)</x:mo><x:mo>&lt;</x:mo><x:mn>8</x:mn><x:mo>×</x:mo><x:msup><x:mn>10</x:mn><x:mrow><x:mo>−</x:mo><x:mn>5</x:mn></x:mrow></x:msup></x:math>, we set a constraint on the coupling constant <hb:math xmlns:hb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><hb:msub><hb:mi>g</hb:mi><hb:mrow><hb:msup><hb:mi>D</hb:mi><hb:mo>+</hb:mo></hb:msup><hb:msubsup><hb:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</hb:mi><hb:mi>c</hb:mi><hb:mo>+</hb:mo></hb:msubsup><hb:mi>n</hb:mi></hb:mrow></hb:msub><hb:mo>&lt;</hb:mo><hb:mn>7.5</hb:mn></hb:math>. Final state interactions lead to a prediction of the decay parameter <kb:math xmlns:kb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><kb:mi>γ</kb:mi><kb:mo stretchy="false">(</kb:mo><kb:msubsup><kb:mi>B</kb:mi><kb:mi>s</kb:mi><kb:mn>0</kb:mn></kb:msubsup><kb:mo stretchy="false">→</kb:mo><kb:msubsup><kb:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</kb:mi><kb:mi>c</kb:mi><kb:mo>+</kb:mo></kb:msubsup><kb:msubsup><kb:mover accent="true"><kb:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</kb:mi><kb:mo stretchy="false">¯</kb:mo></kb:mover><kb:mi>c</kb:mi><kb:mo>−</kb:mo></kb:msubsup><kb:mo stretchy="false">)</kb:mo><kb:mo>&gt;</kb:mo><kb:mn>0.8</kb:mn></kb:math>, whereas pQCD predicts it to be negative. We propose future measurements of <tb:math xmlns:tb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><tb:msup><tb:mi>B</tb:mi><tb:mn>0</tb:mn></tb:msup><tb:mo stretchy="false">→</tb:mo><tb:msubsup><tb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</tb:mi><tb:mi>c</tb:mi><tb:mo>+</tb:mo></tb:msubsup><tb:msubsup><tb:mover accent="true"><tb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</tb:mi><tb:mo stretchy="false">¯</tb:mo></tb:mover><tb:mi>c</tb:mi><tb:mo>−</tb:mo></tb:msubsup></tb:math>, predicting a significant <ac:math xmlns:ac="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ac:mi>S</ac:mi><ac:mi>U</ac:mi><ac:mo stretchy="false">(</ac:mo><ac:mn>3</ac:mn><ac:msub><ac:mo stretchy="false">)</ac:mo><ac:mi>F</ac:mi></ac:msub></ac:math> breaking effect with <ec:math xmlns:ec="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ec:mfrac><ec:mrow><ec:mi mathvariant="script">B</ec:mi><ec:mo stretchy="false">(</ec:mo><ec:msup><ec:mi>B</ec:mi><ec:mn>0</ec:mn></ec:msup><ec:mo stretchy="false">→</ec:mo><ec:msubsup><ec:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</ec:mi><ec:mi>c</ec:mi><ec:mo stretchy="false">+</ec:mo></ec:msubsup><ec:msubsup><ec:mover accent="true"><ec:mi mathvariant="normal">Ξ</ec:mi><ec:mo stretchy="false">¯</ec:mo></ec:mover><ec:mi>c</ec:mi><ec:mo stretchy="false">−</ec:mo></ec:msubsup><ec:mo stretchy="false">)</ec:mo></ec:mrow><ec:mrow><ec:mi mathvariant="script">B</ec:mi><ec:mo stretchy="false">(</ec:mo><ec:msubsup><ec:mi>B</ec:mi><ec:mi>s</ec:mi><ec:mn>0</ec:mn></ec:msubsup><ec:mo stretchy="false">→</ec:mo><ec:msubsup><ec:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</ec:mi><ec:mi>c</ec:mi><ec:mo stretchy="false">+</ec:mo></ec:msubsup><ec:msubsup><ec:mover accent="true"><ec:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</ec:mi><ec:mo stretchy="false">¯</ec:mo></ec:mover><ec:mi>c</ec:mi><ec:mo stretchy="false">−</ec:mo></ec:msubsup><ec:mo stretchy="false">)</ec:mo></ec:mrow></ec:mfrac><ec:mo>=</ec:mo><ec:mn>1.4</ec:mn><ec:mo>%</ec:mo></ec:math>, contrary to the naive estimate of 5.3%. We strongly recommend future measurements. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 110(11)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Institute for Advanced Study (DE), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
1.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.