ICT Use, Self-efficacy, and the Future of Eighth-Grade Students: a Qualitative Study of Gender Differences

Abstract In this study, we have examined gender differences in the way students relate to information and communication technologies (ICT), to learn more about their perceptions of gender-based stereotypes in this area. This study is based on the results of the 2018 International Computer and Information Literacy Study (ICILS), specifically regarding gender differences in responses identified in the Danish results (Bundsgaard et al., 2019). Whereas the results of the ICILS make visible important gender-related concerns, it does not examine the reasons that students complete the tasks and answer the questions as they do. This study seeks to address this. In 2022, we interviewed 44 Danish eighth-grade students in groups, and introduced them to the results of the ICILS 2018, which showed gender differences related to ICT use , studying and working with ICT in the future , and ICT self-efficacy . They were asked to discuss whether the results surprised them, what they thought caused the differences, and whether/how they thought these differences should be eliminated. This study reveals that stereotypes exist in the minds of the students, and that stereotypes contribute to the differences. However, many of the students do not regard gender differences in ICT as a problem. Based on our analysis, we argue that students need a broader conception of what ICT is, and how computers are used in society, which means that aspects of computer science need to be introduced in primary and secondary education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
TechTrends
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-01017-1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gender and Technology in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ICT Use, Self-efficacy, and the Future of Eighth-Grade Students: a Qualitative Study of Gender Differences

Elisa Nadire Caeli, Francesco Caviglia, Jeppe Bundsgaard
2 citations
TechTrends
Gender and Technology in Education
1.86
article

ICT Use, Self-efficacy, and the Future of Eighth-Grade Students: a Qualitative Study of Gender Differences

Elisa Nadire Caeli, Francesco Caviglia, Jeppe Bundsgaard
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this study, we have examined gender differences in the way students relate to information and communication technologies (ICT), to learn more about their perceptions of gender-based stereotypes in this area. This study is based on the results of the 2018 International Computer and Information Literacy Study (ICILS), specifically regarding gender differences in responses identified in the Danish results (Bundsgaard et al., 2019). Whereas the results of the ICILS make visible important gender-related concerns, it does not examine the reasons that students complete the tasks and answer the questions as they do. This study seeks to address this. In 2022, we interviewed 44 Danish eighth-grade students in groups, and introduced them to the results of the ICILS 2018, which showed gender differences related to ICT use , studying and working with ICT in the future , and ICT self-efficacy . They were asked to discuss whether the results surprised them, what they thought caused the differences, and whether/how they thought these differences should be eliminated. This study reveals that stereotypes exist in the minds of the students, and that stereotypes contribute to the differences. However, many of the students do not regard gender differences in ICT as a problem. Based on our analysis, we argue that students need a broader conception of what ICT is, and how computers are used in society, which means that aspects of computer science need to be introduced in primary and secondary education.

TechTrendsVol. 69(1)
Aarhus University (DK)
Aarhus Universitet
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Gender and Technology in Education
1.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.