Impact of conflict on sustainable agricultural practices and transitions in Cambodia

Abstract Cambodian social and economic systems are in an era of transformation as the nation transitions from its history of war and tragedy into a future shaped by more democratic institutions and free market policies. During the 1970s, under the Khmer Rouge, the people of Cambodia were forced to live communally and survive through collective agriculture. Starvation, hard labor, knowledge destruction, and summary execution resulted in a nation facing high levels of poverty, intellectual loss, and food insecurity. Today, while strides have been made to increase economic and social outcomes, the predominantly rural country is still characterized by a weak educational system and economic dependence on agriculture. To better understand the role of the Khmer Rouge era on agriculture, a qualitative comparative case study analysis of Cambodian agriculture pre‐ and post‐Pol Pot regime was conducted. Results indicate that the Khmer Rouge reduced labor availability, stunted rice production output, collectivized and centralized farming systems, intensified production, and created an overall loss of crop diversity and knowledge. It is necessary to understand the influence that the conflict had on Cambodian agricultural systems to assure the nation is able to transition from an unsustainable, extensification‐based agriculture system to a diverse, sustainably intensified agricultural landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Culture Agriculture Food and Environment
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cuag.12324
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cambodian History and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of conflict on sustainable agricultural practices and transitions in Cambodia

Tom Gill, David Ader, Gracie Pekarcik Carter
3 citations
Culture Agriculture Food and Environment
Cambodian History and Society
3.40
article

Impact of conflict on sustainable agricultural practices and transitions in Cambodia

Tom Gill, David Ader, Gracie Pekarcik Carter
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Cambodian social and economic systems are in an era of transformation as the nation transitions from its history of war and tragedy into a future shaped by more democratic institutions and free market policies. During the 1970s, under the Khmer Rouge, the people of Cambodia were forced to live communally and survive through collective agriculture. Starvation, hard labor, knowledge destruction, and summary execution resulted in a nation facing high levels of poverty, intellectual loss, and food insecurity. Today, while strides have been made to increase economic and social outcomes, the predominantly rural country is still characterized by a weak educational system and economic dependence on agriculture. To better understand the role of the Khmer Rouge era on agriculture, a qualitative comparative case study analysis of Cambodian agriculture pre‐ and post‐Pol Pot regime was conducted. Results indicate that the Khmer Rouge reduced labor availability, stunted rice production output, collectivized and centralized farming systems, intensified production, and created an overall loss of crop diversity and knowledge. It is necessary to understand the influence that the conflict had on Cambodian agricultural systems to assure the nation is able to transition from an unsustainable, extensification‐based agriculture system to a diverse, sustainably intensified agricultural landscape.

Culture Agriculture Food and EnvironmentVol. 46(2)
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
United States Agency for International Development
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cambodian History and Society
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.