Enhancing Wildfire Smoke Exposure Assessment: A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Indoor PM <sub>2.5</sub> in British Columbia, Canada

Epidemiological studies typically model wildfire smoke exposure by predicting outdoor fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations, overlooking indoor environments where people spend most of their time. This discrepancy can lead to exposure misclassification for wildfire smoke and other air pollutants. We developed a machine learning (ML) model for estimating daily indoor and outdoor PM2.5 concentrations in British Columbia, Canada, using an ensemble of nonparametric ML algorithms during the 2022 and 2023 wildfire seasons. For model training, we included daily PM2.5 concentrations collected at 44 care facilities equipped with low-cost air quality sensors colocated indoors and outdoors. Model predictors for both indoor and outdoor PM2.5 at the facilities included outdoor PM2.5 and meteorological data from Canada’s National Air Pollution Surveillance Program and Purple Air sensors. The indoor and outdoor models were evaluated with cross validation and then used to compare exposure-response relationships for asthma inhaler dispensations, as an indicator of population respiratory health. Ensemble models accurately predicted PM2.5 indoors (RMSE = 3.29 μg/m3; R2 = 0.71) and outdoors (RMSE = 3.80 μg/m3; R2 = 0.78). For the out-of-sample validation set (2023 wildfire season), the indoor model had a lower RMSE than the outdoor one (RMSEIndoor = 6.65 μg/m3 vs RMSEOutdoor = 9.64 μg/m3). The effect estimates for the relationship between indoor PM2.5 and inhaler dispensations were higher than that for outdoor PM2.5. These results suggest that population-scale indoor PM2.5 exposure assessment is feasible for wildfire smoke epidemiology research, and that using outdoor estimates may bias the true relationship toward the null.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Air
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00204
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Wildfire Smoke Exposure Assessment: A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Indoor PM 2.5 in British Columbia, Canada

Brayden Nilson, Eric S. Coker, Naman Paul, Sarah B. Henderson et al.
5 citations
ACS ES&T Air
Air Quality and Health Impacts
1.57
article

Enhancing Wildfire Smoke Exposure Assessment: A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Indoor PM 2.5 in British Columbia, Canada

Brayden Nilson, Eric S. Coker, Naman Paul, Sarah B. Henderson, Stephanie E. Cleland, Ophir Greif, Michael J. Lee, James M. Dickson, William Ho
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Epidemiological studies typically model wildfire smoke exposure by predicting outdoor fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations, overlooking indoor environments where people spend most of their time. This discrepancy can lead to exposure misclassification for wildfire smoke and other air pollutants. We developed a machine learning (ML) model for estimating daily indoor and outdoor PM2.5 concentrations in British Columbia, Canada, using an ensemble of nonparametric ML algorithms during the 2022 and 2023 wildfire seasons. For model training, we included daily PM2.5 concentrations collected at 44 care facilities equipped with low-cost air quality sensors colocated indoors and outdoors. Model predictors for both indoor and outdoor PM2.5 at the facilities included outdoor PM2.5 and meteorological data from Canada’s National Air Pollution Surveillance Program and Purple Air sensors. The indoor and outdoor models were evaluated with cross validation and then used to compare exposure-response relationships for asthma inhaler dispensations, as an indicator of population respiratory health. Ensemble models accurately predicted PM2.5 indoors (RMSE = 3.29 μg/m3; R2 = 0.71) and outdoors (RMSE = 3.80 μg/m3; R2 = 0.78). For the out-of-sample validation set (2023 wildfire season), the indoor model had a lower RMSE than the outdoor one (RMSEIndoor = 6.65 μg/m3 vs RMSEOutdoor = 9.64 μg/m3). The effect estimates for the relationship between indoor PM2.5 and inhaler dispensations were higher than that for outdoor PM2.5. These results suggest that population-scale indoor PM2.5 exposure assessment is feasible for wildfire smoke epidemiology research, and that using outdoor estimates may bias the true relationship toward the null.

ACS ES&T AirVol. 2(1)
Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), Simon Fraser University (CA), BC Centre for Disease Control (CA), Faculty of Public Health (GB)
Health Canada
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
1.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.