Prediction of Oil and Gas Well Integrity Using Well Construction Physical Parameters and Geospatial Metrics

Oil and gas (O&G) well integrity issues, including sustained casing pressure and casing vent flow, could cause significant environmental and climatic risks by releasing methane-containing fluids into the environment. The large number of O&G wells makes routine inspection or spatiotemporally adequate screening of well integrity issues expensive and sometimes intractable. Machine learning (ML) algorithms with the ability to predict O&G well integrity issues could help prioritize such inspections. We manually extracted well characteristics from 1223 O&G well completion reports in Bradford County, PA, appended geospatial metrics, and used them to predict well integrity issues reported by field tests. Different ML models (e.g., Random Forrest, XGBoost, and Logistic Regression) were compared, and an accuracy of 68% was achieved by comparing the predictions with unseen field test records. Important predictive features were identified by the Random Forrest model, such as the length of casings, amount of cement, and well operator. Moreover, the wells with integrity issues were geospatially clustered in our study region, which could be explained by the clusters of important physical features. Overall, the predictions would help prioritize well integrity inspection and have the potential to guide well design and well location selection for mitigating integrity issues that lead to methane emissions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Fuels
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c03758
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of Oil and Gas Well Integrity Using Well Construction Physical Parameters and Geospatial Metrics

Jennifer J. Zhang, Yunpo Li, Ming Lei, Emily Zhang et al.
2 citations
Energy & Fuels
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
0.57
article

Prediction of Oil and Gas Well Integrity Using Well Construction Physical Parameters and Geospatial Metrics

Jennifer J. Zhang, Yunpo Li, Ming Lei, Emily Zhang, Sebastian M. Quintero, Desirée L. Plata, Loris Bernard, M. Alder, Abdurahman Sherif, Fabian Yanez-Laguna, Ethan D. Nguyen, Kai T. McClennen, Lesley L. Lambaric, Lindsay McBride
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Oil and gas (O&G) well integrity issues, including sustained casing pressure and casing vent flow, could cause significant environmental and climatic risks by releasing methane-containing fluids into the environment. The large number of O&G wells makes routine inspection or spatiotemporally adequate screening of well integrity issues expensive and sometimes intractable. Machine learning (ML) algorithms with the ability to predict O&G well integrity issues could help prioritize such inspections. We manually extracted well characteristics from 1223 O&G well completion reports in Bradford County, PA, appended geospatial metrics, and used them to predict well integrity issues reported by field tests. Different ML models (e.g., Random Forrest, XGBoost, and Logistic Regression) were compared, and an accuracy of 68% was achieved by comparing the predictions with unseen field test records. Important predictive features were identified by the Random Forrest model, such as the length of casings, amount of cement, and well operator. Moreover, the wells with integrity issues were geospatially clustered in our study region, which could be explained by the clusters of important physical features. Overall, the predictions would help prioritize well integrity inspection and have the potential to guide well design and well location selection for mitigating integrity issues that lead to methane emissions.

Energy & FuelsVol. 39(1)
Parsons (United States) (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.