Use of 801 Acellular Dermal Matrices (ADMs) in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Clinical Observation of Complication Profiles Over a 7-Year Period

Abstract Background The emergence of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) revolutionized prepectoral breast reconstruction, allowing partial or complete implant coverage. ADM had been described to possess several important benefits; nevertheless, the literature described an increased postoperative complication rate. Objectives The aim of this study was to delineate H.Y.K.’s experience with ADM in direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction, and to describe complication rate and patient satisfaction. Methods This was a retrospective patient cohort that underwent primary or revisional breast reconstruction (DTI) utilizing DermaCell, from Jan 2017 to Jan 2024. Results A total of 230 consecutive patients, 410 breasts, and 801 DermaCell sheets were evaluated. All were DTI breast reconstructions. Complication rate was described per breast. A total of 92 cases of complication occurred (22.4%). Rippling was seen in 18 breasts (4.39%), skin ischemia in 21 breasts (5.12%), hematoma in 5 (1.21%), and seroma in 9 (2.19%). Seventeen breasts experienced capsular contraction. In the nonirradiated group, capsular contracture (CC), Baker grade 3 to 4, was seen in 4 breasts (1.11%), with 9 (18%) in the irradiated group. The postoperative follow-up period was 18 months (range: 6-84 months). BREAST-Q satisfaction with the breast increased by a mean of 10.45. Satisfaction with the implant was 6.61 out of 8. Conclusions This cohort study represents the most comprehensive and up-to-date experience with DermaCell for DTI breast reconstructive surgery. The favorable complication profile suggests that DermaCell ADM offers a safe and reliable option, making it an important tool in the armamentarium of reconstructive plastic surgeon. DermaCell is an important component in prepectoral breast reconstruction, contributing to better results, an improved complication profile, and patient satisfaction. Level of Evidence: 4 (Therapeutic)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae238
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of 801 Acellular Dermal Matrices (ADMs) in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Clinical Observation of Complication Profiles Over a 7-Year Period

Roman Rysin, Haim Yoel Kaplan
2 citations
Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
1.15
article

Use of 801 Acellular Dermal Matrices (ADMs) in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Clinical Observation of Complication Profiles Over a 7-Year Period

Roman Rysin, Haim Yoel Kaplan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The emergence of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) revolutionized prepectoral breast reconstruction, allowing partial or complete implant coverage. ADM had been described to possess several important benefits; nevertheless, the literature described an increased postoperative complication rate. Objectives The aim of this study was to delineate H.Y.K.’s experience with ADM in direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction, and to describe complication rate and patient satisfaction. Methods This was a retrospective patient cohort that underwent primary or revisional breast reconstruction (DTI) utilizing DermaCell, from Jan 2017 to Jan 2024. Results A total of 230 consecutive patients, 410 breasts, and 801 DermaCell sheets were evaluated. All were DTI breast reconstructions. Complication rate was described per breast. A total of 92 cases of complication occurred (22.4%). Rippling was seen in 18 breasts (4.39%), skin ischemia in 21 breasts (5.12%), hematoma in 5 (1.21%), and seroma in 9 (2.19%). Seventeen breasts experienced capsular contraction. In the nonirradiated group, capsular contracture (CC), Baker grade 3 to 4, was seen in 4 breasts (1.11%), with 9 (18%) in the irradiated group. The postoperative follow-up period was 18 months (range: 6-84 months). BREAST-Q satisfaction with the breast increased by a mean of 10.45. Satisfaction with the implant was 6.61 out of 8. Conclusions This cohort study represents the most comprehensive and up-to-date experience with DermaCell for DTI breast reconstructive surgery. The favorable complication profile suggests that DermaCell ADM offers a safe and reliable option, making it an important tool in the armamentarium of reconstructive plastic surgeon. DermaCell is an important component in prepectoral breast reconstruction, contributing to better results, an improved complication profile, and patient satisfaction. Level of Evidence: 4 (Therapeutic)

Aesthetic Surgery JournalVol. 45(3)
Assaf Harofeh Medical Center (IL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Use of 801 Acellular Dermal Matrices (ADMs) in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Clinical Observation of Complication Profiles Over a 7-Year Period — Roman Rysin, Haim Yoel Kaplan · Aesthetic Surgery Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS