A critical study of the Monte Carlo replica method

A bstract We present a detailed mathematical study of the Monte Carlo replica method as applied in the global fitting literature from the high-energy physics theory community. For the first time, we provide a rigorous derivation of the parameter distributions implied by the method, and show that, whilst they agree with Bayesian posteriors for linear models, they disagree otherwise. We proceed to numerically quantify the disagreement between the Monte Carlo replica method and the Bayesian method in the context of two phenomenologically relevant scenarios: fits of the SMEFT Wilson coefficients, and fits of PDFs (albeit in a toy scenario). In both scenarios, we find that uncertainty estimates of the quantities of interest are discrepant between the two approaches when non-linearity is relevant. Our findings motivate future investigation of Bayesian methodologies for global PDF fits, especially in the context of simultaneous determination of PDFs and SMEFT Wilson coefficients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep12(2024)064
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A critical study of the Monte Carlo replica method

Luca Mantani, James M. Moore, Maeve Madigan, Mark N. Costantini
8 citations
Journal of High Energy Physics
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
5.28
article

A critical study of the Monte Carlo replica method

Luca Mantani, James M. Moore, Maeve Madigan, Mark N. Costantini
article en
8 citations

Abstract

A bstract We present a detailed mathematical study of the Monte Carlo replica method as applied in the global fitting literature from the high-energy physics theory community. For the first time, we provide a rigorous derivation of the parameter distributions implied by the method, and show that, whilst they agree with Bayesian posteriors for linear models, they disagree otherwise. We proceed to numerically quantify the disagreement between the Monte Carlo replica method and the Bayesian method in the context of two phenomenologically relevant scenarios: fits of the SMEFT Wilson coefficients, and fits of PDFs (albeit in a toy scenario). In both scenarios, we find that uncertainty estimates of the quantities of interest are discrepant between the two approaches when non-linearity is relevant. Our findings motivate future investigation of Bayesian methodologies for global PDF fits, especially in the context of simultaneous determination of PDFs and SMEFT Wilson coefficients.

Journal of High Energy PhysicsVol. 2024(12)
Heidelberg University (DE), University of Cambridge (GB)
Science and Technology Facilities Council
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
5.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.